Economic Evaluation of a Sun Protection Promotion Program in California Elementary Schools
Richard T Meenan1, Kim D Reynolds2, David B Buller3
1Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Background:
An economic evaluation of Sun Safe Schools intervention designed to aid California elementary schools with implementing sun safety practices consistent with local board-approved policy.
Design:
Program cost analysis: intervention delivery and practice implementation.
Setting:
California elementary schools (58 interventions and 60 controls). Principals at 52 intervention and 53 control schools provided complete implementation data.
Participants:
Principals completing pre-/postintervention surveys assessing practice implementation.
Intervention:
Phone-based 45-minute session with a project coach on practice implementation, follow-up e-mails/phone contacts, $500 mini-grant. Schools chose from a list of 10 practices for implementation: ultraviolet monitoring, clothing, hats, and/or sunscreen recommendations, outdoor shade, class education, staff training and/or modeling, parent outreach, and resource allocation. The duration of intervention was 20 months. Rolling recruitment/intervention: February 2014 to December 2017.
Measures:
Intervention delivery and practice implementation costs. Correlations of school demographics and administrator beliefs with costs.
Analysis:
Intervention delivery activities micro-costed. Implemented practices assessed using costing template.
Results:
Intervention schools: 234 implemented practices, control schools: 157. Twenty-month delivery costs: $29 310; $16 653 (per school: $320) for project staff, mostly mini-grants and coaching time. Administrator costs: $12 657 (per school: $243). Per-student delivery costs: $1.01. Costs of implemented practices: $641 843 for intervention schools (per-school mean: $12 343, median: $6 969); $496 365 for controls (per-school mean: $9365, median: $3123). Delivery costs correlated with implemented practices (0.37, P < .01) and total practice costs (0.37, P < .05). Implemented practices correlated with principal beliefs about the importance of skin cancer prevention to student health (0.46, P < .001) and parents (0.45, P < .001).
Conclusion:
Coaching of elementary school personnel can stimulate sun safety practice implementation at a reasonable cost. Findings can assist schools in implementing appropriate sun safety practices.
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Calculating Equilibrium Concentrations
A more...


