Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative analysis of molecular targeted radiosensitizers in 2D and 3D cancer cell line models.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2025
Same author

Evaluative sub-source and activity level reporting in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

Long-term effectiveness of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for complex perianal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn's disease: a retrospective case series.

BMJ open gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Cytotoxic and Radiosensitizing Effects of European and African Propolis in 3D Lung Carcinoma Cell Cultures.

Anticancer research·2024
Same author

(Un)Reliable detection of menstrual blood in forensic casework - evaluation of the Seratec® PMB test with mock samples.

International journal of legal medicine·2023
Same author

Prognostic biomarkers for the response to the radiosensitizer nimorazole combined with RCTx: a pre-clinical trial in HNSCC xenografts.

Journal of translational medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

5.0K

Inter-laboratory adaption of age estimation models by DNA methylation analysis-problems and solutions.

Manuel Pfeifer1, Thomas Bajanowski1, Janine Helmus1

  • 1Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.

International Journal of Legal Medicine
|February 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

DNA methylation age prediction models require validation for cross-laboratory use. Retraining models improved accuracy, highlighting the need for DNA standards to normalize data for reliable biological age determination.

Keywords:
CpG makerDNA methylationEstimation of biological agePyrosequencing

More Related Videos

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.8K
Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

26.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

5.0K
Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.8K
Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

26.1K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Forensic Science
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • DNA methylation-based age prediction models are emerging for biological age determination.
  • Cross-laboratory validation is crucial for routine application of these epigenetic clocks.
  • Previous models utilized specific CpG sites in genes like ASPA, EDARADD, PDE4-C, and ELOVL2.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the cross-laboratory accuracy of two published DNA methylation age prediction models.
  • To evaluate the performance of these models on blood and buccal swab samples.
  • To investigate methods for improving the accuracy and reliability of epigenetic age prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Tested two established DNA methylation age prediction models using blood and buccal swab samples.
  • Analyzed prediction accuracy by calculating the mean absolute difference (MAD) between chronological and predicted age.
  • Retrained the prediction models and re-evaluated their accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Initial testing showed higher MAD values (9.84 years for blood, 8.32 years for buccal swabs) than reported, suggesting inter-laboratory variability.
  • Retraining the models significantly improved prediction accuracy, achieving MADs of 5.55 years (blood) and 4.65 years (buccal swabs).
  • The study identified DNA methylation variances in certain CpGs as a likely cause for lower initial accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Published DNA methylation age prediction models may not perform as expected across different laboratories without standardization.
  • Retraining and optimizing models can enhance prediction accuracy for biological age estimation.
  • Effective DNA standards are essential for normalizing DNA methylation data, enabling reliable comparison and application of age prediction models.