Predictors of left ventricular remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy - a cardiovascular magnetic
Upasana Tayal1,2, Ricardo Wage2, Simon Newsome3
1National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
Insights
Left ventricular (LV) remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) can be predicted by LV contractile reserve. Low LV contractile reserve indicates a reduced likelihood of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in DCM patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a significant condition requiring improved biomarkers for predicting left ventricular (LV) remodelling.
- Accurate prediction of LV remodelling is crucial for managing DCM and optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively assess cardiac structure and myocardial composition to identify predictors of LV remodelling in recent-onset DCM.
- To determine the relationship between baseline cardiac parameters and the change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) over 12 months.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving patients with recent-onset DCM and controls, utilizing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
- CMR assessments included ventricular structure and function, extracellular volume (T1 mapping), myocardial strain, late gadolinium enhancement (scar), and dobutamine stress for contractile reserve.
- Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of LVEF change over 12 months.
Main Results:
- Absolute LV contractile reserve was a significant predictor of LVEF change at 12 months (P=0.02).
- Baseline myocardial strain, interstitial fibrosis, replacement fibrosis, and right ventricular contractile reserve did not predict LV reverse remodelling.
- Men were more likely to experience adverse LV remodelling (P=0.01), while age and heart failure medications did not predict follow-up LVEF.
Conclusions:
- Most patients with recent-onset DCM experience substantial LV function recovery within 12 months, with women showing the greatest improvement.
- Low LV contractile reserve, as measured by dobutamine stress CMR, identifies patients with a lower likelihood of LVEF recovery.
- LV contractile reserve emerges as a key biomarker for predicting functional recovery in DCM.
Aims:
There is an important need for better biomarkers to predict left ventricular (LV) remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We undertook a comprehensive assessment of cardiac structure and myocardial composition to determine predictors of remodelling.
Methods And Results:
Prospective study of patients with recent-onset DCM with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of ventricular structure and function, extracellular volume (T1 mapping), myocardial strain, myocardial scar (late gadolinium enhancement) and contractile reserve (dobutamine stress). Regression analyses were used to evaluate predictors of change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) over 12 months. We evaluated 56 participants (34 DCM patients, median LVEF 43%; 22 controls). Absolute LV contractile reserve predicted change in LVEF (1% increase associated with 0.4% increase in LVEF at 12 months, P = 0.02). Baseline myocardial strain (P = 0.39 global longitudinal strain), interstitial myocardial fibrosis (P = 0.41), replacement myocardial fibrosis (P = 0.25), and right ventricular contractile reserve (P = 0.17) were not associated with LV reverse remodelling. There was a poor correlation between contractile reserve and either LV extracellular volume fraction (r = -0.22, P = 0.23) or baseline LVEF (r = 0.07, P = 0.62). Men were more likely to experience adverse LV remodelling (P = 0.01) but age (P = 0.88) and disease-modifying heart failure medication (beta-blocker, P = 0.28; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, P = 0.92) did not predict follow-up LVEF.
Conclusions:
Substantial recovery of LV function occurs within 12 months in most patients with recent-onset DCM. Women had the greatest improvement in LVEF. A low LV contractile reserve measured by dobutamine stress CMR appears to identify patients whose LVEF is less likely to recover.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction


