Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
Published on: March 12, 2018
The State of Quality Improvement Teaching in Medical Schools: A Systematic Review
Roshini Peiris-John1, Vanessa Selak2, Gillian Robb2
1Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Introduction:
While teaching patient safety and quality improvement (QI) skills to medical students is endorsed as being important, best practice for achieving learner outcomes in QI is particularly unclear. We systematically reviewed QI curricula for medical students to identify approaches to QI training that are associated with positive learner outcomes.
Methods:
We searched databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus) and article bibliographies for studies published from 2009 to 2018. Studies evaluating QI teaching for medical students in any setting and reporting learner outcomes were included. Educational content, teaching format, achievement of learning outcomes, and methodological features were abstracted. Outcomes assessed were learners' satisfaction, attitudes, knowledge and skills, changes in behavior and clinical processes, and benefits to patients.
Results:
Twenty of 25 curricula targeted medical students exclusively. Most curricula were well accepted by students (11/13 studies), increased their confidence in QI (9/11) and led to knowledge acquisition (17/20). Overall, positive learner outcomes (Kirkpatrick Levels 1 to 4A) were demonstrated across a range of curricular content and teaching modalities. In particular, 2 curricula demonstrated positive changes in learners' behavior (Kirkpatrick Level 3), both incorporating a clinical audit or QI project based in hospitals, and supplemented by didactic lectures. Seven curricula were associated with improvements in processes of care (Kirkpatrick Level 4A) all of which were set in a clinical setting and supplemented by didactic lectures and/or small group sessions. None of the curricula evaluated patient benefits (Kirkpatrick Level 4B).
Conclusions:
Whilst there is heterogeneity in educational content and teaching methods, most curricula are well accepted and led to learners' knowledge acquisition. Although there is limited evidence for the impact of QI curricula on learner behavior and benefit to patients, and for interprofessional QI curricula, teaching QI in the clinical setting leads to better learner outcomes with location being potentially a surrogate for clinical experience.
More Related Videos
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...