Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
Effects of load carriage on biomechanical variables associated with tibial stress fractures in running
Michael Baggaley1, Michael Esposito1, Chun Xu2
1Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Background:
Military personnel are required to run while carrying heavy body-borne loads, which is suggested to increase their risk of tibial stress fracture. Research has retrospectively identified biomechanical variables associated with a history of tibial stress fracture in runners, however, the effect that load carriage has on these variables remains unknown.
Research Question:
What are the effects of load carriage on running biomechanical variables associated with a history of tibial stress fracture?
Methods:
Twenty-one women ran at 3.0 m/s on an instrumented treadmill in four load carriage conditions: 0, 4.5, 11.3, and 22.7 kg. Motion capture and ground reaction force data were collected. Dependent variables included average loading rate, peak absolute free moment, peak hip adduction, peak rearfoot eversion, and stride frequency. Linear mixed models were used to asses the effect of load carriage and body mass on dependent variables.
Results:
A load x body mass interaction was observed for stride frequency only (p = 0.017). Stride frequency increased with load carriage of 22.7-kg, but lighter participants illustrated a greater change than heavier participants. Average loading rate (p < 0.001) and peak free moment (p = 0.015) were greater in the 22.7-kg condition, while peak rearfoot eversion (p ≤ 0.023) was greater in the 11.3- and 22.7-kg conditions, compared to the unloaded condition. Load carriage did not affect peak hip adduction (p = 0.67).
Significance:
Participants adapted to heavy load carriage by increasing stride frequency. This was especially evident in lighter participants who increased stride frequency to a greater extent than heavier participants. Despite this adaptation, running with load carriage of ≥11.3-kg increased variables associated with a history of tibial stress fracture, which may be indicative of elevated stress fracture risk. However, the lack of concomitant change amongst variables as a function of load carriage may highlight the difficulty in assessing injury risk from a single measure of running biomechanics.
More Related Videos
09:32Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
Fatigue