Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interactions between statisticians and biomedical journal editors.

R G Marks1, E K Dawson-Saunders, J C Bailar

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

Statistics in Medicine
|October 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The future of web-based clinical research in dentistry.

Journal of dental research·2004
Same author

A call for an international ban on asbestos.

Public health reviews·2002
Same author

Associations between daily cause-specific mortality and concentrations of ground-level ozone in Montreal, Quebec.

American journal of epidemiology·2001
Same author

Identification of persons with cardiorespiratory conditions who are at risk of dying from the acute effects of ambient air particles.

Environmental health perspectives·2001
Same author

Paradigm shifts in clinical trials enabled by information technology.

Statistics in medicine·2001
Same author

The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec. 1. Nonaccidental mortality.

Environmental research·2001
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study explores improving collaboration between statisticians and biomedical journal editors to address common statistical issues in research publications. It offers guidance for editors on manuscript review and identifying statistical expertise.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Publishing
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Increasing role of statisticians in biomedical research publication.
  • Need for enhanced communication between statisticians and journal editors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify strategies for improving interactions between statisticians and biomedical journal editors.
  • To address key challenges in statistical review of manuscripts.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of common statistical problems in manuscripts.
  • Guidelines for statistical design information in methods sections.
  • Strategies for editors to identify manuscripts requiring statistical review.
  • Guidance on interpreting statistical reviewer feedback.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Methods for editors to find qualified statistical reviewers.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified critical statistical issues in biomedical manuscripts.
    • Outlined essential statistical design details for methods sections.
    • Provided criteria for editors to select papers needing statistical review.
    • Offered insights into understanding statistical reviewer comments.
    • Suggested approaches for editors to recruit statistical reviewers.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced collaboration can improve the quality of statistical reporting in biomedical research.
    • Clearer communication and defined processes benefit both statisticians and editors.
    • Proactive engagement with statistical review strengthens scientific rigor.