Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
Published on: February 22, 2020
Developing the implicit association test to uncover hidden preferences for sustainable drainage systems
Emily O'Donnell1, Shaun Maskrey1,2, Glyn Everett3
1School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Public perception of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) is complex. While people prefer greenspaces without SuDS, implicit and explicit testing reveals nuanced attitudes crucial for improving urban flood resilience.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Urban Planning
- Psychology
Background:
- Understanding public perception of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) is vital for overcoming implementation barriers.
- Traditional explicit measures (e.g., questionnaires) for evaluating perceptions may be biased and incomplete.
- Unconscious attitudes towards SuDS in public greenspaces require novel investigation methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate unconscious public perceptions of SuDS using an innovative image-based Implicit Association Test.
- To compare implicit and explicit attitudes towards greenspaces with and without SuDS.
- To explore the relationship between explicit and implicit perceptions and their implications for SuDS design and acceptance.
Main Methods:
- Development and application of an image-based Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess unconscious perceptions of SuDS.
- Integration of IAT with explicit measures (e.g., questionnaires) to evaluate attitudes towards greenspaces.
- Study conducted on a sample population in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, focusing on public greenspace.
Main Results:
- The sample population perceived greenspaces with and without SuDS positively.
- Respondents demonstrated a preference for greenspaces without SuDS, rating them as more attractive, tidier, and safer, both implicitly and explicitly.
- A wide distribution of scores for SuDS indicated diverse opinions, highlighting the complexity of greenspace preferences.
Conclusions:
- Explicitly negative perceptions regarding tidiness and safety associated with SuDS may not reflect deeply held beliefs and could be influenced by social biases.
- The discrepancy between explicit and implicit test results suggests that stated attitudes towards natural spaces may not align with underlying behaviors.
- Combined implicit and explicit testing offers a more comprehensive understanding of public perception, informing SuDS design to enhance public acceptance and urban flood resilience.
More Related Videos
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
08:09Wastewater Irrigation Impacts on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity: Coupled Field Sampling and Laboratory Determination of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Published on: August 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Testing Water Quality
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Surveys