Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
Optimizing PD-L1 evaluation on cytological samples from advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Cecilia Bozzetti1, Anna Squadrilli1, Rita Nizzoli1
1Medical Oncology Unit, Department of General & Specialistic Medicine, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Assessing programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on cytological smears is reliable for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This method is feasible when histological samples are insufficient for PD-L1 protein and gene evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Pathology
- Cancer Diagnostics
Background:
- Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a key biomarker for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Advanced NSCLC diagnosis often relies on minimally invasive procedures yielding small biopsies or cytological samples, posing challenges for comprehensive biomarker assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of assessing PD-L1 protein and gene status on direct cytological smears from NSCLC patients.
- To compare PD-L1 assessment on cytological samples with paired histological samples.
Main Methods:
- PD-L1 expression was analyzed using immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on cytological smears and histological samples, respectively.
- PD-L1 gene status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on both sample types.
- The study included 52 advanced NSCLC patients with paired cytological and histological samples.
Main Results:
- PD-L1 overexpression was detected in 17% of cytological samples and 13.5% of matched biopsies.
- High concordance (92.3%) was observed between ICC and IHC for PD-L1 protein assessment.
- Concordance for PD-L1 gene status between cytology and histology was 69.2%, with no correlation found between IHC and FISH results.
Conclusions:
- PD-L1 protein and gene assessment on direct cytological smears is feasible and reliable for NSCLC patients.
- Cytological samples can serve as a viable alternative for PD-L1 testing when histological samples are inadequate.
- This approach supports timely treatment decisions for NSCLC patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
09:32Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018