Drowning Classification: A Reappraisal of Clinical Presentation and Prognosis for Severe Cases

Drowning is still a major cause of accidental death worldwide. In 1997, Szpilman proposed a classification of drowning that has become the reference. As considerable efforts have been made to improve prevention and care, it seemed appropriate to reassess the prognosis and clinical presentation of drowning patients more than 20 years after this first publication. The aim of this study is to provide a reappraisal of patients who need advanced health care and a precise description of their respective neurologic, respiratory, and hemodynamic profiles.

This retrospective study was conducted over four consecutive summer periods between 2014 and 2017 in ICUs located in France, French Polynesia, and the French Antilles. Patients were classified according to the drowning classification system proposed by Szpilman.

During the study period, 312 drowning patients were admitted with severe clinical presentation (grades 2-6). All patients benefited from rapid extraction from the water (< 10 min for all) and specialized care (emergency medical services), starting from the prehospital period. Although the global hospital mortality was similar to that previously reported (18.5%), great differences existed among the severity grades. Respective grade mortalities were low for grades 2 through 5 (grade 2, 0%; grade 3, 3%; grade 4, 0%; grade 5, 2%), and the mortality for grade 6 remained similar to that previously reported (54%). These results confirmed that the occurrence of cardiac arrest after drowning is still bad prognosis. Conversely, for other grades, this study strengthens the importance of specialized intervention to interrupt the drowning process.

On the basis of these results, drowning-related cardiac arrest is still the prognosis cornerstone. For other victims, the prognosis was better than previously expected, which strengthens the importance of specialized intervention to interrupt the drowning process.