Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025
Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
Evaluation of RNA purification methods by using different blood stabilization tubes: identification of key features
J A Carrillo-Ávila1,2, R de la Puente3, P Catalina3
1Andalusian Public Health System Biobank, Coordinating Node, Granada, Spain. jantonio.carrillo@juntadeandalucia.es.
Objective:
Peripheral blood is the most promising source of RNA biomarkers for diagnostic and epidemiological studies, because the presence of disease and prognostic information is reflected in the gene expression pattern. Quality RNA is used by a number of different downstream applications, so the selection of the most appropriate RNA stabilization and purification method is important. We have analyzed the RNA purified from 300 blood samples from 25 donors processed by two technicians using three methodologies with Tempus and PaxGene tubes.
Results:
The best quality sample results were obtained with the Tempus Spin RNA Isolation Kit and the PaxGene Blood miRNA Kit, although larger amounts of RNA were obtained with the Tempus Spin RNA Isolation Kit. Lower Cq values were observed for RNA and miRNA genes in samples that were tested with PaxGene Blood miRNA Kit and Tempus Spin RNA Isolation Kit respectively. We identify the Tempus Spin RNA Isolation Kit as the most robust methodology, whilst the MagMax for Stabilized Blood Tubes RNA Isolation Kit showed the most instability. For biobanks, which process a large cohort and conduct epidemiological studies, the Tempus Spin RNA Isolation Kit is the most appropriate methodology. The study demonstrates the robustness of real-life procedures.
