Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Elucidating the Effects of Augmented Reality Head-Worn Display Factors on Performance, Trust, and Behavior.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same author

Perceived Usability, User Experience, and Technology Acceptance of Role-Specific Augmented Reality Decision Support Tools for Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

JMIR XR and spatial computing·2026

Same author

Augmented Reality-Guided Decision Support in Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Impact of an augmented reality-based decision support system on teamwork, leadership, provider workload and cognitive load during simulated cardiac arrest - a simulation-based randomized controlled trial.

Advances in simulation (London, England)·2026

Same author

Evaluating a Shared Decision Support Tool for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest: Mixed Methods Usability Study.

JMIR human factors·2026

Same author

Streamlined Facial Data Collection Based on Utterance and Emotional Data for Human-to-Avatar Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

Two-phase Impulse Fluid on Particle Flow Map.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

FGO-SLAM++: Real-time Geometry-Aware Gaussian SLAM with Continuous Opacity Field.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

Blue Noise Dithering for Reservoir-based Spatio-temporal Importance Resampling.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

ROS-GS: Relightable Outdoor Scenes With Gaussian Splatting.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

MesoSplats: Texture Synthesis with Gaussian Splatting.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same journal

GLLA: A Unified Force-Directed Graph Layout Framework Supporting Local Adjustments.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Effects of Depth Information on Visual Target Identification Task Performance in Shared Gaze Environments.

Austin Erickson, Nahal Norouzi, Kangsoo Kim

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

|February 20, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Augmented reality (AR) gaze cues significantly impact collaborative tasks. A ray visualization improved performance over a cursor, but a ray and cursor with depth information was rated highest for effective human-computer interaction.

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
Augmented Reality (AR)
Collaborative Systems

Background:

Human gaze awareness is crucial for social and collaborative interactions.
Augmented reality (AR) technology enables real-time gaze indicators, such as cursors or rays, to enhance collaborative spaces.
The effectiveness of AR gaze cues depends on gaze estimation accuracy and display mechanisms, with potential for both enhancement and interference.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the influence of angular and depth errors in AR gaze visualizations on collaborative task performance.
To evaluate the impact of different gaze visualization types (ray, cursor) and their configurations on user performance and subjective experience.
To determine optimal AR gaze cue designs for effective collaboration with virtual partners.

Main Methods:

Conducted two human-subject studies involving a collaborative task where participants identified targets in a dynamic virtual crowd.
Simulated angular and depth errors in AR gaze estimation and display.
Compared performance and subjective evaluations across different gaze visualizations (ray, cursor, combinations) and error conditions.

Main Results:

The ray visualization significantly outperformed the cursor visualization in terms of response times and error reduction under simulated angular and depth errors.
Under optimal conditions, a ray without depth information yielded the worst performance and lowest ratings.
A combination of ray and cursor visualizations with depth information received the highest subjective ratings.

Conclusions:

AR gaze visualizations significantly affect collaborative task performance, with specific designs offering distinct advantages.
Ray visualizations are more effective than cursors in mitigating errors caused by inaccurate gaze estimation.
Integrating depth information with combined ray and cursor visualizations appears to be the most effective approach for enhancing collaborative AR experiences.