Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cranial base and jaw relationship.

W J Kerr1, C P Adams

  • 1Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, Scotland.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|October 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abstracts of the 24th international isotope society (UK group) symposium: synthesis and applications of labelled compounds 2015.

Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals·2016
Same author

Practically convenient and industrially-aligned methods for iridium-catalysed hydrogen isotope exchange processes.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2014
Same author

The modified arrowhead clasp.

The Dental record·2014
Same author

Singlet-triplet excitations in the unconventional spin-Peierls TiOBr compound.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

The symballophone.

Archivos del Instituto de Cardiologia de Mexico·2010
Same author

Pneumonia in the aged.

Clinics·2010
Same journal

A geometric morphometric assessment of shape variation in adult pelvic morphology.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Corrigendum: Infanticide in chimpanzees: Taphonomic case studies from Gombe.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the non-obstetric pelvis across anthropoids.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

The biological index of frailty: A new index for the assessment of frailty in human skeletal remains.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Mass violence in Copper Age Europe: The massacre burial site from Potočani, Croatia.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Skeletal evidence of structural violence among undocumented migrants from Mexico and Central America.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
See all related articles

Cranial base size and shape influence jaw relationships in growing boys. Smaller cranial bases and decreased angles correlate with Class II malocclusion, impacting condyle position.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Craniofacial Morphology
  • Pediatric Dentistry

Background:

  • Understanding the relationship between cranial base morphology and jaw relationships is crucial for diagnosing and treating malocclusion.
  • Previous studies suggest a link, but the precise influence of cranial base dimensions and angles on different occlusal classes requires further elucidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between cranial base size and shape and jaw relationships (occlusal classes) in approximately 10-year-old boys.
  • To determine how cranial base morphology influences the anteroposterior positioning of the condyle relative to facial landmarks.

Main Methods:

  • Digitization of lateral skull radiographs from 124 boys, equally distributed across four occlusal angle classes.
  • Analysis of cranial base dimensions, angles, and condyle position relative to specific cephalometric landmarks (nasion, point A, Pterygomaxillary vertical).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A trend from Class II to Class III malocclusion was observed as cranial base dimensions and angles decreased.
  • The condyle was positioned more distally in Class II groups relative to nasion, point A, and the Pterygomaxillary vertical.
  • Cranial base length showed strong correlation with maxillary length but weak correlation with mandibular length; maxillary size did not affect prognathism.

Conclusions:

  • Cranial base size and shape significantly influence mandibular prognathism.
  • The anteroposterior position of the condyle, determined by cranial base morphology, is a key factor in establishing facial profile and jaw relationships.