Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
A multicenter retrospective study of 223 patients with t(14;16) in multiple myeloma
Sarah Goldman-Mazur1, Artur Jurczyszyn1, Jorge J Castillo2
1Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Abstract:
The t(14;16) translocation, found in 3%-5% of newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM), has been associated with adverse outcomes. However, the studies establishing the characteristics of t(14;16) included solely small cohorts. The goal of the current international, multicenter (n = 25 centers), retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of t(14;16) patients in a large, real-world cohort (n = 223). A substantial fraction of patients had renal impairment (24%) and hemoglobin <10 g/dL (56%) on initial presentation. Combined therapy of both immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitor (PI) in the first line was used in 35% of patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation was performed in 42% of patients. With a median follow up of 4.1 years (95% CI 3.7-18.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from first line therapy were 2.1 years (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and 4.1 years (95% CI 3.3-5.5), respectively. Worse OS was predicted by age > 60 years (HR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.05-2.58]), as well as revised International Scoring System (R-ISS) 3 (vs R-ISS 2; HR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.59-4.24]). In conclusion, based on the largest reported cohort of t(14;16) patients, quarter of this subset of MM patients initially presents with renal failure, while older age and the R-ISS 3 predict poor survival.
Insights
The t(14;16) translocation in multiple myeloma (MM) affects 3-5% of patients. This large study found renal impairment and older age predict poor survival in these MM patients.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Genetics
Background:
- The t(14;16) translocation is a genetic abnormality found in a subset of multiple myeloma (MM) patients.
- Previous studies on t(14;16) MM characteristics and outcomes were limited by small cohort sizes.
- This genetic marker has been associated with a poorer prognosis in MM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with the t(14;16) translocation in multiple myeloma.
- To analyze a large, real-world cohort to provide more robust data on this specific MM subset.
- To identify prognostic factors influencing survival in t(14;16) MM patients.
Main Methods:
- An international, multicenter, retrospective study involving 223 patients with t(14;16) multiple myeloma.
- Data collection included initial presentation characteristics, first-line therapies, and outcomes.
- Statistical analysis was performed to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to identify predictors of survival.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion of patients (24%) presented with renal impairment, and 56% had hemoglobin <10 g/dL.
- First-line therapy commonly involved immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors (35%), with 42% undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.
- Median PFS was 2.1 years and median OS was 4.1 years. Age >60 years and revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage 3 were associated with worse OS.
Conclusions:
- The t(14;16) translocation in multiple myeloma is associated with a high rate of renal impairment at diagnosis.
- Older age and advanced disease stage (R-ISS 3) are significant predictors of poor survival in this patient group.
- This study provides crucial insights into the characteristics and outcomes of t(14;16) MM based on the largest reported cohort to date.
More Related Videos
09:41An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
05:32Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019