Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
Published on: January 7, 2019
Automated Myocardial T2 and Extracellular Volume Quantification in Cardiac MRI Using Transfer Learning-based
Yanjie Zhu1, Ahmed S Fahmy1, Chong Duan1
1Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 (Y.Z., A.S.F., C.D., S.N., R.N.).
Purpose:
To assess the performance of an automated myocardial T2 and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification method using transfer learning of a fully convolutional neural network (CNN) pretrained to segment the myocardium on T1 mapping images.
Materials And Methods:
A single CNN previously trained and tested using 11 550 manually segmented native T1-weighted images was used to segment the myocardium for automated myocardial T2 and ECV quantification. Reference measurements from 1525 manually processed T2 maps and 1525 ECV maps (from 305 patients) were used to evaluate the performance of the pretrained network. Correlation coefficient (R) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement between automated and reference values on per-patient, per-slice, and per-segment analyses. Furthermore, transfer learning effectiveness in the CNN was evaluated by comparing its performance to four CNNs trained using manually segmented T2-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted images and initialized using random-weights or weights of the pretrained CNN.
Results:
T2 and ECV measurements using the pretrained CNN strongly correlated with reference values in per-patient (T2: R = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 0.91; ECV: R = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.93), per-slice (T2: R = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.85; ECV: R = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.86), and per-segment (T2: R = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.77; ECV: R = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.77) analyses. In Bland-Altman analysis, the automatic and reference values were in good agreement in per-patient (T2: 0.3 msec ± 2.9; ECV: -0.3% ± 1.7), per-slice (T2: 0.1 msec ± 4.6; ECV: -0.3% ± 2.5), and per-segment (T2: 0.0 msec ± 6.5; ECV: -0.4% ± 3.5) analyses. The performance of the pretrained network was comparable to networks refined or trained from scratch using additional manually segmented images.
Conclusion:
Transfer learning extends the utility of pretrained CNN-based automated native T1 mapping analysis to T2 and ECV mapping without compromising performance. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020.
