Biopsychosocial outcome indicators in traumatic brain injuries

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a silent and global epidemic which creates an aftermath of convoluted dynamics. Despite significant incidence rates and increasing awareness over the long-term catastrophic implications, there remain marked contrasts between acute vs. post-acute rehabilitation processes in the United States.

To explore existing research and highlight the complexity of TBIs to inform vital changes needed to reduce the significant differences and inconsistencies across post-acute treatment settings. To highlight how psychologists/neuropsychologists and other rehabilitation professionals maintain a prominent operational presence in post-acute settings resulting in key leadership opportunities to support a more efficient longitudinal continuation of care model.

Literature search of various health science databases was completed for articles between 1987 to 2019 to explore the range and depth of post-acute treatment, model, and outcomes research.

Despite progressive medical advancements, translation of relevant rehabilitation research and practices into post-acute treatment settings remains inconsistent.

Significant barriers remain for objective and comprehensive evaluation(s) of post-acute program quality and purported patient outcomes in the United States. There remains a lack of consensually relevant and objective metrics. Further investigation is recommended for: consensus on longitudinal post-acute brain injury outcome measures; functional relevance of program accreditations/certifications; outcome differences based on team composition and program resources; and patient/stakeholder variables/input to support optimal post-acute service access and delivery.