Using outcome harvesting: Assessing the efficacy of CBME implementation

In 2015, Queen's University embarked on an institution-wide transition to a competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum for all 29 postgraduate medical education programmes. On 1 July 2017, this goal was accomplished. With this mass transition came the requirement to assess the efficacy of implementation through a programme evaluation process, which included the use of outcome harvesting (Wilson-Grau). Outcome harvesting identified the intended and unintended outcomes of CBME implementation, which helped us understand how the intervention was achieved and how the relationship between behaviours and stakeholders contributed to the successful transition.

A systematic approach to document analysis was used to categorize the eight identified areas of implementation: governance, scholarship, faculty development, resident leadership, curriculum, assessment, communications, and technology. Documents (N = 443) were organized per project area and then coded thematically. Documents were then categorized for attribution to outcomes using the outcome harvesting approach. Outcomes were validated via interrater reliability and substantiated by stakeholders to verify accuracy of formulation and plausibility of its influence on the outcome.

The harvest produced 38 outcomes, either intended or unintended, that can be attributed to CBME implementation at Queen's University.

Using outcome harvesting to assess the efficacy of CBME implementation produced a robust set of themes and resultant outcomes that can be categorized as requirements for success of implementation of any curricular innovation. Emergent themes included collaboration, community of practice, and stakeholder commitment. More unique observations noted through the harvest process included new policy development, creation of learner ownership, and an increase in the output of scholarly activity involving CBME.