Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Circuit Survival during Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis versus Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration
Alfonso Maria Califano1, Laurent Bitker2,3, Ian Baldwin2
1Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) technique may affect circuit lifespan. A shorter circuit life may reduce CRRT efficacy and increase costs.
Methods:
In a before-and-after study, we compared circuit median survival time during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) versus continuous venovenous hemodialysis (-CVVHD). We performed log-rank mixed effects univariate analysis and Cox mixed effect regression modeling to define predictors of circuit lifespan.
Results:
We compared 197 -CVVHD and 97 CVVH circuits in 39 patients. There was no overall difference in circuit lifespan. When no anticoagulation was used, median circuit survival time was shorter for CVVH circuits (5 h, 95% CI 3-7 vs. 10 h, 95% CI 8-13, p < 0.01). Moreover, CVVHD, lower platelets levels, and longer activated partial thromboplastin time independently predicted longer circuit median survival time.
Conclusions:
CVVHD is associated with longer circuit median survival time than CVVH when no anticoagulation is used and is an independent predictor of circuit survival.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications

