Retrospective cohort study monitoring PEG-asparaginase activity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with and

Michael Losasso1, Bruce Bostrom2, Yoav Messinger2

  • 1University of St. Thomas, 2115 Summit Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55105, USA.

F1000Research
|February 25, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Silent inactivation of pegaspargase is rare in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Routine monitoring of pegaspargase activity is recommended only for patients receiving more than two doses.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • PEG-L-asparaginase (pegaspargase) is crucial for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment.
  • Allergic reactions and silent neutralizing antibodies can lead to pegaspargase discontinuation.
  • Premedication may reduce allergic reactions but its effect on silent inactivation is unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of silent inactivation of pegaspargase.
  • To compare the incidence of allergic reactions with and without premedication in ALL patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed children and young adults with ALL.
  • Monitoring asparaginase activity using a commercial assay after pegaspargase administration.
  • Comparing allergic reaction incidence before and after premedication initiation.

Main Results:

  • Silent inactivation occurred in 1.7% of patients after the second dose; none after the first dose.
  • Premedication showed a non-significant trend towards lower allergic reaction rates (8.3% vs. 17% per patient).
  • Premedication did not impact pegaspargase activity.

Conclusions:

  • Silent inactivation of pegaspargase is infrequent, especially with intravenous administration.
  • Routine monitoring of pegaspargase activity is not necessary for patients receiving two or fewer doses.
  • Monitoring is recommended for patients scheduled for more than two pegaspargase doses.