Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area
Lisa M Powell1, Julien Leider1, Pierre Thomas Léger1
1University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (L.M.P., J.L., P.T.L.).
Background:
Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is linked to adverse health outcomes.
Objective:
To evaluate the impact of the 2017 Cook County, Illinois, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT) on the volume of taxed and untaxed beverages sold in Cook County and its 2-mile border area.
Design:
Pre-post intervention-comparison site difference-in-differences study.
Setting:
Cook County, Illinois, and St. Louis City and County, Missouri, 2016 to 2017.
Participants:
Universal product code-level store scanner data from supermarkets and grocery, convenience, drug, mass merchandise, and dollar stores.
Measurements:
Beverage volume sold of taxed and untaxed beverages, across product categories and sizes.
Results:
Volume sold of taxed beverages decreased by 27% (ratio of incidence rate ratios [RIRR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.75]) on average in Cook County relative to St. Louis during the 4 months that the SBT was in effect (compared with the same 4-month pretax period), with a net decrease of 21% after increases in volume sold in its border area (cross-border shopping) were taken into account. The magnitude of the decrease in volume sold across types of taxed beverages was heterogeneous: -32% (RIRR, 0.68 [CI, 0.65 to 0.72]) for soda versus -11% (RIRR, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.97]) for energy drinks, -37% (RIRR, 0.63 [CI, 0.59 to 0.66]) for artificially sweetened beverages versus -25% (RIRR, 0.75 [CI, 0.72 to 0.79]) for SSBs, and -29% (RIRR, 0.71 [CI, 0.68 to 0.74]) for family-size versus -19% (RIRR, 0.81 [CI, 0.79 to 0.84]) for individual-size beverages. There was no significant change in volume sold of untaxed beverages in Cook County or its border area.
Limitation:
Data source did not allow for evaluation by store type or distance of outlets from the border.
Conclusion:
The Cook County SBT led to a substantial reduction in the volume sold of taxed beverages in Cook County. Part of this effect was offset by cross-border shopping. Cross-border shopping was limited to tax avoidance and did not extend to untaxed beverages.
Primary Funding Source:
Bloomberg Philanthropies.
Related Concept Videos
Sugars as Energy Storage Molecules
Physical Properties Affecting Solubility
As for any solution, the solubility of a gas in a liquid is affected by the attractive intermolecular forces between solute and solvent species. Unlike solid and liquid solutes, however, there is no solute-solute intermolecular attraction to overcome when a gaseous solute dissolves in a liquid solvent since the atoms or molecules comprising a gas are far separated and experience negligible interactions. Consequently, solute-solvent interactions are the sole...
Self-Regulation
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Glucose Absorption Into the Small Intestine
Calculating pH Changes in a Buffer Solution

