Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test.

J P Rosenfeld1, B Cantwell, V T Nasman

  • 1Northwestern University, Department of Psychology and Neurobiology, Evanston, IL.

The International Journal of Neuroscience
|September 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feedback does not influence the recognition-related P300 in a novel concealed information test while feedback-evoked P300 shows promising diagnostic accuracy.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2020
Same author

[GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES DURING PREGNANCY].

Akusherstvo i ginekologiia·2016
Same author

[THE ROLE OF POSITIVE PERITONEAL CYTOLOGY DURING THE SURGERY OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER].

Akusherstvo i ginekologiia·2015
Same author

[Uterine leiomyoma and fibroleiomyoma: treatment for non-pregnant women ].

Akusherstvo i ginekologiia·2015
Same author

[OVARIAN CANCER RECURRENCES IN PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODES].

Akusherstvo i ginekologiia·2015
Same author

[COMBINED APPLICATION OF FETAL FIBRONECTIN AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR IN PRETERM DELIVERY DIAGNOSIS--OUR RESULTS].

Akusherstvo i ginekologiia·2015

Participants could not avoid noticing a chosen object, even when attempting to focus on other items. This suggests that consciously ignored stimuli can still capture attention.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Attention is crucial for information processing.
  • Understanding how the brain processes attended versus unattended stimuli is key to cognitive function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether consciously ignored objects can still elicit neural responses.
  • To examine the neural correlates of selective attention and stimulus salience.

Main Methods:

  • Participants "stole" an object and then viewed visual displays containing the chosen object among novel objects.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically P3 responses, were recorded while participants performed a counting task on novel objects.
  • P3 responses were analyzed for trials involving the chosen object versus novel objects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • P3 responses were observed for both the "chosen" object and the "counted" novel objects.
  • This pattern occurred in 7 out of 10 participants, indicating a neural response to the ignored, chosen item.
  • The findings suggest that the chosen object, despite being ignored, was processed by the brain.

Conclusions:

  • The brain automatically processes salient, even if intentionally ignored, information.
  • Selective attention mechanisms may not completely suppress the processing of unwanted stimuli.
  • P3 ERP component can reflect the detection of salient, task-irrelevant stimuli.