Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

37.3K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
37.3K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

61.5K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
61.5K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

42.7K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
42.7K
Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

1.1K
Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations,...
1.1K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

33.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.8K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

43.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Egg and larval production of Eastern Baltic cod in captivity over one spawning season.

Journal of fish biology·2026
Same author

Temperature constrains diet-induced plasticity in the life-history of an aquatic vertebrate.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Assessing local adaptation and divergence at early life stages within Eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua).

Journal of fish biology·2026
Same author

Metamorphosis Reverses the Behavioral Phenotype in <i>Rana arvalis</i> Along a Latitudinal Gradient.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Deep learning reveals the complex genetic architecture of male guppy colouration.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

MHC Diversity Across Time and Space.

Ecology and evolution·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.1K

Gene Flow Limits Adaptation along Steep Environmental Gradients.

Judith C Bachmann, Alexandra Jansen van Rensburg, Maria Cortazar-Chinarro

    The American Naturalist
    |February 26, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    Steeper environmental gradients reduce adaptive population divergence in frogs. This countergradient variation in development is weaker on steep gradients, leading to less adaptation and more maladaptation.

    Keywords:
    amphibianclimate gradientcountergradient variationgene flowisolation-by-distance methodmaladaptation

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution
    08:11

    Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution

    Published on: June 14, 2024

    1.3K
    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
    04:52

    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

    Published on: February 3, 2023

    1.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

    Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
    15:00

    Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

    Published on: August 18, 2023

    4.1K
    Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution
    08:11

    Author Spotlight: Understanding Microbe Adaptation Using Innovative Techniques for Exploring Thermophilic Evolution

    Published on: June 14, 2024

    1.3K
    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
    04:52

    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

    Published on: February 3, 2023

    1.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Ecology
    • Evolutionary Biology
    • Population Genetics

    Background:

    • Dispersing individuals typically move to similar habitats, but steep environmental gradients can connect divergent habitats via gene flow.
    • This gene flow is predicted to weaken adaptive clines, reducing population divergence.
    • Countergradient variation, where populations adapt to local conditions, is a key evolutionary response.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare quantitative genetic divergence in frog populations along elevational and latitudinal gradients.
    • To investigate the impact of environmental gradient steepness on adaptive population divergence and countergradient variation.
    • To test predictions about reduced adaptation on steep environmental gradients.

    Main Methods:

    • Experimental comparison of Rana temporaria populations along a 2,000-m elevational gradient and a 1,550-km latitudinal gradient.
    • Genotyping of individuals at ~2,000 single-nucleotide polymorphism markers to assess dispersal and gene flow.
    • Meta-analysis of 19 experimental studies on anuran populations across temperature gradients.

    Main Results:

    • Significant countergradient variation in larval development rate was found in both elevational and latitudinal studies.
    • The adaptive cline was weaker along the elevational gradient compared to the latitudinal gradient.
    • Dispersal distance was greater on the latitudinal gradient, but gene flow was more effective across environmental conditions on the elevational gradient.
    • Meta-analysis confirmed that countergradient variation is weaker on steeper gradients.

    Conclusions:

    • Adaptive population divergence is less pronounced on steep environmental gradients.
    • Steeper gradients facilitate greater maladaptation due to reduced effectiveness of natural selection.
    • Environmental gradient steepness is a critical factor influencing evolutionary adaptation and population divergence.