Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

197
Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
197
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

142
A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...
142
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations01:23

Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations

115
Nomograms and tabulations are vital tools used by clinicians to design accurate and individualized dosage regimens. These instruments provide a straightforward method for adjusting dosages based on individual patient characteristics, including age, weight, and physiological condition. The foundation of a drug's nomogram is population pharmacokinetic data collected and analyzed using specific models. This data simplifies complex equations, presenting them diagrammatically or tabularly for easy...
115
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

188
Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
188
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose01:01

Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose

2.2K
Fixed-dose regimens are a common approach to administer drugs to achieve and maintain desired levels of the drug in the body. In this dosing strategy, a specific amount of medication is given at regular intervals, often multiple times a day, to ensure a consistent drug concentration in the bloodstream.
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
2.2K
Dosage Regimen: Individualization01:24

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

122
Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...
122

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating clinical trial hazard functions.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

A Note on the Complementary Mixture Pareto II Distribution.

Communications in statistics: theory and methods·2026
Same author

Factors influencing the selection of an SGLT2i vs. a GLP-1RA as cardioprotective agent in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2025
Same author

Response to comments on 'sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance'.

The international journal of biostatistics·2024
Same author

Comment on "Causal interpretation of the hazard ratio in randomized clinical trials" by Fay and Li.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2024
Same author

Predicting Hospital Readmission in Medicaid Patients With COPD Using Administrative and Claims Data.

Respiratory care·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.6K

Flexible, rule-based dose escalation: The cohort-sequence design.

Shuang Li1, Xian-Jin Xie2, Daniel F Heitjan1,3

  • 1Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
|February 27, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new "cohort-sequence" design for Phase I oncology trials, improving upon the traditional 3+3 design. The cohort-sequence method efficiently identifies the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with fewer patients, enhancing early-phase cancer drug development.

Keywords:
Dose-expansion cohortDose-finding designDrug safetyPhase I clinical trial

More Related Videos

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.9K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.6K
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.9K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Phase I oncology trials are crucial for assessing novel treatment safety.
  • Current rule-based designs, like the 3+3, are often inflexible and inefficient.
  • There is a need for improved designs to optimize dose escalation and patient enrollment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel rule-based design, the "cohort-sequence" design, for Phase I oncology trials.
  • To address the limitations of traditional designs in terms of efficiency and flexibility.
  • To enable rapid and accurate identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

Main Methods:

  • The proposed cohort-sequence design utilizes a sequence of increasing cohort sizes and critical values.
  • The design escalates through planned doses, increasing cohort size upon observing toxicities.
  • Parameter selection (J and θ) allows for efficient identification of a target toxicity rate and potential dose expansion.

Main Results:

  • The cohort-sequence design generally identifies the MTD more rapidly than the 3+3 design.
  • This approach avoids unnecessary patient enrollment at lower doses with likely low toxicity and response rates.
  • Simulations demonstrated the design's efficiency across various toxicity scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The cohort-sequence design offers a more efficient and flexible alternative to the 3+3 design for Phase I oncology trials.
  • This method optimizes patient enrollment and accelerates the identification of the MTD.
  • The design is available as an R package, facilitating its implementation in clinical research.