Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Smartphone Fundus Photography
Published on: July 6, 2017
An Assesment of Usefulness of Smartphone as a Magnifying Device for Microsurgery Training
Kamil Leśniewski1, Konrad Czernikiewicz1, Andrzej Żyluk2
1Studenckie Koło Naukowe przy Klinice Chirurgii Ogólnej i Chirurgii Ręki, Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Szczecinie, Polska / Student's Scientific Circle at the Department of General and Hand Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland.
Background:
Currently available smartphones are equipped with optic systems allowing even 10x magnifi-ca-tion, which makes it possible to use them as magnifying devices for microsurgery training. The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of smartphones for basic microsurgery training.
Material And Methods:
Two students began experimental microsurgical training using a smartphone as a magni-fy-ing device. Both students had acquired microsurgical skills following training under the microscope. For the expe-riment, the time of completion of a "6 stitches" test was measured and compared for each student using a smartphone and a microscope, after 1 and 6 hours of training using only a smartphone.
Results:
After one hour of training, the first student completed the "6 stitches" test within 7:52 min. under the mi-croscope and within 16:35 min. using a smartphone, while the respective scores of the second student were 12:31 and 20:12 min.. In both cases the time required to complete the test was longer when working with a smartphone. The test was repeated after 6 hours of practice with a telephone, and the results now were as follows: first student 7:10 min. with the microscope and 12:50 min. with a smartphone, second student 8:54 min. with the microscope and 12:01 min. with a smartphone.
Conclusions:
1. The microsurgical skills of both trainees improved gradually when they were using a smartphone (by 3:8 min. and 8:1 min) and the microscope (by 0:4 min. and 3:8 min). 2. Two drawbacks of the smartphone were noticed: lack of three-dimensional vision, deteriorating vertical orientation in the operating field and worse vision quality compared to the microscope. 3. Advantages of this tool include the availability of training at home, low cost and possibility of analysis of images recorded in the smartphone memory.

