Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding Latin abbreviations: a survey.

D I McBride, I S McLellan

    The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
    |May 1, 1988
    PubMed
    Summary

    Pharmacists accurately translated most Latin abbreviations, while general practitioners, especially trainees, struggled with less common terms. This highlights a knowledge gap in medical abbreviation comprehension among some physicians.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Society for Environmental Geochemistry and Health (SEGH): building for the future of early career researchers.

    Environmental geochemistry and health·2020
    Same author

    Responsible corporate change: detecting and managing employee stress.

    Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2015
    Same author

    Riot control agents: the tear gases CN, CS and OC-a medical review.

    Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2014
    Same author

    Assessing individual employee risk factors for occupational asthma in primary aluminium smelting.

    Occupational and environmental medicine·2004
    Same author

    Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss.

    Occupational and environmental medicine·2000
    Same author

    Air blast circuit breaker noise and hearing loss: a multifactorial model for risk assessment.

    Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Clinical Practice
    • Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Background:

    • Latin abbreviations are frequently used in medical documentation.
    • Accurate interpretation of medical abbreviations is crucial for patient safety and effective communication.
    • Understanding of these abbreviations may vary between different healthcare professionals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the translation accuracy of 20 common Latin abbreviations among general practitioners and retail pharmacists.
    • To identify potential differences in comprehension between general practitioner principals and trainees.
    • To evaluate the level of understanding of medical Latin abbreviations in a specific healthcare setting.

    Main Methods:

    • A questionnaire was administered to general practitioner principals, general practitioner trainees, and retail pharmacists in West Scotland.
    • Participants were asked to translate 20 selected Latin abbreviations.
    • Data on translation accuracy was collected and analyzed.

    Main Results:

    • Retail pharmacists demonstrated a high level of understanding of the Latin abbreviations.
    • General practitioner principals and trainees showed lower accuracy, particularly with less frequently used abbreviations.
    • Trainee general practitioners exhibited a greater likelihood of misunderstanding compared to principals.

    Conclusions:

    • While pharmacists possess strong knowledge of Latin abbreviations, a significant portion of general practitioners, especially trainees, require further education on these terms.
    • The study indicates a need for improved training and continuous professional development regarding medical abbreviations for general practitioners.
    • Enhancing the understanding of Latin abbreviations among healthcare professionals is essential for reducing medical errors and improving interprofessional communication.

    Related Experiment Videos