Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Perspectivism and the Argument from Guidance
Jonathan Way1, Daniel Whiting1
1Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.
Abstract:
Perspectivists hold that what you ought to do is determined by your perspective, that is, your epistemic position. Objectivists hold that what you ought to do is determined by the facts irrespective of your perspective. This paper explores an influential argument for perspectivism which appeals to the thought that the normative is action guiding. The crucial premise of the argument is that you ought to φ only if you are able to φ for the reasons which determine that you ought to φ. We show that this premise can be understood in different ways. On one reading, it provides no support for perspectivism. On another reading, the premise lacks support. So, the argument fails. An important upshot of the paper is that the objectivist can embrace the thought about guidance.
Related Concept Videos
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Social Proof
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Hindsight Biases
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

