Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Microhoneycomb Monoliths Prepared by the Unidirectional Freeze-drying of Cellulose Nanofiber Based Sols: Method and Extensions
Published on: May 24, 2018
Coverage-Controlled Superstructures of C3 -Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling.
Torben Jasper-Tönnies1, Manuel Gruber1, Sandra Ulrich2
1Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, 24098, Kiel, Germany.
Researchers created large honeycomb molecular superstructures on surfaces, forming 2D templates for guest molecules. Unit cell size is controllable, and a new model explains pattern formation based on molecular symmetry and bonding.
Area of Science:
- Surface Science
- Supramolecular Chemistry
- Materials Science
Background:
- Molecular self-assembly on surfaces can form ordered structures.
- Honeycomb and hexagonal tiling are common motifs in molecular arrangements.
- These superstructures can serve as templates for functional materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the formation of large honeycomb superstructures using C3 symmetric molecules on metal surfaces.
- To develop a general model for understanding the energetics and pattern formation of these superstructures.
- To explore the potential of these superstructures as 2D templates.
Main Methods:
- Experimental synthesis and characterization of molecular superstructures on Au(111) and Ag(111) surfaces.
- Utilizing scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) for structural analysis.
- Development and application of a theoretical model based on energetics and geometric parameters.
Main Results:
- Formation of large-scale honeycomb superstructures with unit cells up to 3000 molecules, significantly larger than previously reported.
- Demonstration that unit cell size can be controlled by molecular coverage.
- Validation of a general model that accurately describes the energetics and driving forces of pattern formation.
Conclusions:
- C3 symmetric molecules can form extensive honeycomb superstructures on Au(111) and Ag(111) surfaces.
- A general energetic model successfully explains the observed pattern formation, highlighting geometric factors.
- These large superstructures offer promising platforms for templating functional guest molecules in 2D.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Conformations of Cyclohexane
The chair form is the most stable and derives its name from its resemblance to the “easy chair.” In the chair conformation, two carbon atoms are arranged out-of-plane — one above and one below, minimizing the torsional strain. In the chair form, the bond angle is very close to the ideal...
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Structures of Solids
Stereoisomerism of Cyclic Compounds

