Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

22.1K

[Second opinion in retinal imaging].

Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg1,2, Laura Kühlewein3, Sebastian M Waldstein4,5

  • 1GRADE Reading Center, Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Str. 2, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. steffen.schmitz-valckenberg@ukbonn.de.

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft
|February 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical manifestations of dual-gene variants in retinitis pigmentosa.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same author

Real-world outcomes after switching to faricimab in previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration: longitudinal outcomes up to 24 months.

International journal of retina and vitreous·2026
Same author

Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor From Müller Cells Is Involved in Angiopoietin-Mediated Survival Control of Retinal Neurons.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

The Clinical Significance of Imaging Biomarkers Discoverable by Anomaly Detection Methods in Retinal Diseases: A Review.

Journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Aqueous Humor Biomarkers, Efficacy, and Safety in Patients with Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Faricimab: The ALTIMETER Study.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy in comparison-microsecond-pulse laser versus photodynamic therapy.

Die Ophthalmologie·2026
Same journal

["DOG 2020 online" - for the first time in the von Graefe year].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2024
Same journal

[Are organ and co-cultures an alternative to animal models in ophthalmology?]

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Pediatric corneal opacities : Even small improvements provide lifelong help].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Myxoma of the conjunctiva].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Secondary open-angle glaucoma: uveitic secondary glaucoma, steroid-induced glaucoma, posttraumatic and postoperative glaucoma, tumor-related glaucoma and glaucoma due to elevated episcleral venous pressure].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Artificial intelligence in the management of anti-VEGF treatment: the Vienna fluid monitor in clinical practice].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Digital imaging and data exchange enhance the importance of second opinions in retinal imaging. Meeting technical and quality standards is crucial for high-quality patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Digital Health

Background:

  • Digital imaging systems and data exchange are transforming medical diagnostics.
  • The role of second opinions is growing in importance across various medical fields.
  • Retinal imaging benefits significantly from advancements in digital technology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the increasing significance of second opinions in retinal imaging.
  • To outline the essential technical and medical quality requirements for effective second opinions.
  • To emphasize the need for clear responsibility definitions in the second opinion process.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current digital imaging systems in retinal imaging.
  • Analysis of medical assessment quality requirements for second opinions.
Keywords:
DiagnosticsQuality managementReading centerRetinal imagingTelemedicine

More Related Videos

Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
07:23

Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Published on: March 26, 2020

8.6K
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
07:44

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: July 24, 2020

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

22.1K
Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
07:23

Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Published on: March 26, 2020

8.6K
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
07:44

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: July 24, 2020

3.3K
  • Discussion on the definition of responsibilities for effective implementation.

    • Main Results:

    • Digital imaging and data exchange facilitate remote second opinions in retinal imaging.
    • Fulfillment of technical imaging and medical assessment quality requirements is essential.
    • Clear definition of responsibilities is necessary for successful integration.

    Conclusions:

    • Second opinions in retinal imaging are vital for patient care, enabled by digital technology.
    • Adherence to stringent technical and quality standards ensures the meaningful application of second opinions.
    • Defined responsibilities are key to leveraging second opinions for improved patient outcomes.