Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

5.7K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
5.7K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

381
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
381
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

293
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
293
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

925
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
925
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

553
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
553

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic compression of whole-brain neural trajectories during human motor learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Rapid responses to reach errors are equally strong during fixation and visual pursuit.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Adaptive integration of model-based and model-free strategies in human reinforcement learning of reachable space.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The retrieval of previously learned motor memories is facilitated by the reinstatement of default mode network manifold structures.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Motor cortex flexibly deploys a high-dimensional repertoire of subskills.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Age-dependent predictors of effective reinforcement motor learning across childhood.

eLife·2025
Same journal

Combinatorial multiomic analysis from a pedigree of Sox10Dom Hirschsprung mice identifies multiple high confidence candidate modifiers of Enteric Nervous System development.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Extracting host-specific developmental signatures from longitudinal microbiome data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Population sparseness determines strength of Hebbian plasticity for maximal memory lifetime in associative networks.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Predictive coding explains asymmetric connectivity in the brain: A neural network study.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Zooplankton feeding behavioral signatures in the morphology of macroscale prey spatial distribution.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

A brief overview of 20 years of neuroscience in PLoS Computational Biology.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.9K

Human decision making anticipates future performance in motor learning.

Joshua B Moskowitz1, Daniel J Gale1, Jason P Gallivan1,2,3

  • 1Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Plos Computational Biology
|February 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People anticipate future motor improvements to make optimal decisions for maximizing rewards during motor learning. This study investigated how individuals adjust their choices based on expected performance gains in virtual tasks.

More Related Videos

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

22.0K
A Fine Motor Task to Study Joint Kinematics in a Preclinical Model of Neurodegenerative Disease
05:39

A Fine Motor Task to Study Joint Kinematics in a Preclinical Model of Neurodegenerative Disease

Published on: June 13, 2025

608

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.9K
Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

22.0K
A Fine Motor Task to Study Joint Kinematics in a Preclinical Model of Neurodegenerative Disease
05:39

A Fine Motor Task to Study Joint Kinematics in a Preclinical Model of Neurodegenerative Disease

Published on: June 13, 2025

608

Area of Science:

  • Motor control and learning
  • Decision-making under uncertainty
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Individuals can optimize reward by considering their error distributions in motor tasks.
  • Motor learning involves a decrease in errors over successive trials.
  • Understanding anticipatory decision-making in motor learning is crucial for optimizing performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals account for future performance improvements in motor learning when making decisions to maximize reward.
  • To determine if people can predict their decreasing error rates to inform reward-optimizing choices.

Main Methods:

  • Two virtual tasks were employed: a target selection task and a reward structure selection task under visuomotor rotation.
  • Participants performed tasks where movement errors decreased exponentially across trials.
  • Optimal decision-making required considering future performance in both tasks.

Main Results:

  • Results from both tasks indicated that participants anticipated their future motor performance.
  • Participants made decisions that improved their expected future reward based on anticipated performance.
  • This suggests a proactive adjustment of strategies in response to learning.

Conclusions:

  • Humans proactively adjust their decision-making strategies in motor learning to maximize future rewards.
  • Anticipation of improved motor performance plays a key role in optimizing reward-based choices.
  • This finding has implications for designing adaptive training systems and understanding human learning.