Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.9K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.9K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.8K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.9K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Virtual Reality Psychosocial Intervention for Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT-VR): Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Assessing the Benefit of Specialist Palliative Care in Oncology: Rethinking Clinical Trial Design.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025
Same author

Demographics, facilitators, and barriers among predominantly heated yoga users: a survey of the largest U.S. yoga studio brand.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Blended palliative and survivorship care intervention (POISE) for patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Multisite Randomized Trial of Inpatient Palliative Care Intervention for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025
Same author

Preliminary efficacy of prolonged exposure therapy to reduce suicide risk in co-occurring bipolar disorder & trauma symptoms.

Journal of affective disorders·2025
Same journal

A Bayesian functional concurrent zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model with application to infant microbiome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

Randomization-based confidence intervals for cluster randomized trials.

Dustin J Rabideau1, Rui Wang2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|March 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new randomization-based method for confidence intervals in cluster randomized trials (CRTs). It offers a distribution-free approach for various outcomes, improving precision in intervention effect estimation.

Keywords:
Cluster randomized trialConfidence intervalCorrelated dataInterval-censoredPermutation testRandomization-based inference

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are essential for evaluating interventions in group settings.
  • Traditional statistical methods for CRTs often require strong distributional assumptions or numerous clusters for reliable confidence interval (CI) coverage.
  • Existing methods face challenges with non-continuous and survival outcomes when inverting randomization tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general, distribution-free method for constructing randomization-based confidence intervals (CIs) using individual-level data from CRTs.
  • To develop a flexible approach that accommodates diverse outcome types and complex trial designs.
  • To provide a computationally efficient algorithm for practical application.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel randomization-based inference method for CIs applicable to individual-level data in CRTs.
  • The method is designed to be distribution-free, accommodating various outcome types including interval-censored time-to-event data.
  • Incorporated features to handle design aspects like matching and stratification, utilizing an efficient algorithm.

Main Results:

  • Simulations demonstrated the method's robust performance in maintaining nominal CI coverage.
  • The approach was successfully applied to the Botswana Combination Prevention Project, a large-scale HIV prevention trial.
  • The method proved effective for interval-censored time-to-event outcomes within a complex CRT.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed randomization-based method provides a valid and flexible alternative for constructing CIs in CRTs.
  • This approach overcomes limitations of traditional methods, particularly for non-continuous and survival outcomes.
  • It offers improved precision and reliability in estimating intervention effects, even with fewer clusters.