Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Placenta-Targeted Drug Delivery Using Three Complementary Methods
Published on: September 10, 2018
Prelabor screening at term using the cerebroplacental ratio and placental growth factor: a pragmatic randomized
Helen C Sherrell1, Vicki L Clifton1, Sailesh Kumar2
1Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Background And Objective:
In some women placental function may not be adequate to meet fetal growth requirements in late pregnancy or the additional demands during labor, thus predisposing these infants to intrapartum fetal compromise and subsequent serious morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine if the introduction of a prelabor screening test at term combining the cerebroplacental ratio and maternal placental growth factor level would result in a reduction in a composite of adverse outcomes.
Study Design:
Single-site, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Eligible women were randomized to either receive the screening test performed between 37-38 weeks or routine obstetric care. Screen-positive women were offered induction of labor. The primary outcome was a composite of emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status (fetal distress) or severe neonatal acidosis or low Apgar score or stillbirth or neonatal death.
Results:
Women were recruited and randomized (n = 501) between April 2017 and January 2019. Sixty-three of 249 subjects (25.3%) in the screened group compared to 56 of 252 (22.2%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome (relative risk = 1.14 [95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.56]; P = .418). Women who screened positive were more likely to require operative delivery for fetal distress, have meconium-stained liquor, have pathologic fetal heart rate abnormalities, and have infants with lower birthweight compared to women that screened negative.
Conclusion:
The introduction of this test did not result in improvements in intrapartum intervention rates or neonatal outcomes. However, it did show discriminatory potential, and future research should focus on refining the thresholds used.

