Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

340
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
340
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

302
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
302
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

13.9K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
13.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paralysis in public health: evidence as an alibi? - Authors' reply.

The Lancet. Public health·2026
Same author

Quantitative bias analysis for time to event data needs good validation data.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Combined Oral Contraceptives and Stroke Risk in Individuals With Migraine With Aura.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Hepatitis B and C Prevention, Screening and Diagnostic Services at HIV Treatment Sites: International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

One- and Two-Year Outcomes of Switching to a Dolutegravir-Based ART Regimen: An Observational Emulation of Sequential Target Trials.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Uptake and retention in HIV care among pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV under different eras of vertical transmission prevention policies in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same journal

GLP-1 receptor agonist medications for weight loss: Sociodemographic patterns of awareness, use, and access in a U.S. national cohort.

Annals of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Even low levels of physical activity are associated with lower all-cause mortality: A cohort study of 594,000 US adults.

Annals of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Distinct differences between COVID-19 vaccine refusers and vaccine hesitant in the United States: Results from a population-based survey and latent class analysis".

Annals of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Translating caregiver-identified neighborhood features into quantitative variables for statistical analyses of effects on child health.

Annals of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Associations between the built environment and body mass index among a residentially stable cohort of mid-older aged adults in Brisbane, Australia (2007-2016).

Annals of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Unmeasured air pollution, adiposity measurement, and life-stage transitions in the HABITAT built environment-BMI analysis.

Annals of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K

Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning.

Matthew P Fox1, Timothy L Lash2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Annals of Epidemiology
|March 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Epidemiologists can improve study validity by simulating biases during planning. Quantitative bias analysis helps prioritize data collection investments for better epidemiological research and funding success.

Keywords:
ConfoundingGrant planningInformation biasQuantitative bias analysisSelection bias

More Related Videos

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

803
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

803
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Research Methodology

Background:

  • Epidemiologists traditionally focus on random error reduction in study design.
  • Cost-efficiency considerations for systematic errors, like measurement and misclassification, are less explored.
  • Understanding these trade-offs is crucial for robust study planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce quantitative bias analysis for evaluating cost-efficiencies in addressing systematic errors.
  • To guide investigators in resource allocation for data collection to maximize validity.
  • To enhance study planning by simulating the impact of anticipated biases.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing information from study size calculations to simulate expected data.
  • Applying quantitative bias analysis to estimate the impact of anticipated biases.
  • Demonstrating the approach with a case study on pregnancy smoking and breast cancer.

Main Results:

  • Simulation and bias analysis can identify critical areas for improved data collection.
  • Investment in more valid instruments is not always cost-efficient for improving validity.
  • The example showed poor exposure sensitivity for smoking on birth certificates, with limited validity gains from better measures.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative bias analysis offers a framework for cost-efficient error management in epidemiological studies.
  • Investigators can better justify resource allocation by proactively addressing potential biases.
  • This approach can improve the validity and impact of health research findings.