Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

A Novel Method to Determine the Longitudinal Antibacterial Activity of Drug-Eluting Materials
Published on: March 3, 2023
Oral Flucloxacillin for Treating Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review of Clinical Practice
Helga Preiss1, Philipp Kriechling2, Giulia Montrasio1
1Internal Medicine, Baden Hospital, Baden, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Flucloxacillin (FLU) administered by the oral route is widely used for treating various infections, but there are no published retrospective or prospective trials of its efficacy, or its advantages or disadvantages compared to parenteral treatment or other antibiotics for treating osteomyelitis. Based on published in vitro data and expert opinions, other non-β-lactam oral antibiotics that have better bone penetration are generally preferred over oral FLU. We reviewed the literature for studies of oral FLU as therapy of osteomyelitis (OM), stratified by acute versus chronic and pediatric versus adult cases. In striking contrast to the prevailing opinions and the few descriptive data available, we found that treatment of OM with oral FLU does not appear to be associated with more clinical failures compared to other oral antibiotic agents. Because of its narrow antibiotic spectrum, infrequent severe adverse effects, and low cost, oral FLU is widely used in clinical practice. We therefore call for investigators to conduct prospective trials investigating the effectiveness and potential advantages of oral FLU for treating OM.
Insights
Oral flucloxacillin is commonly used for osteomyelitis despite limited evidence. This review found no increased clinical failures compared to other oral antibiotics, suggesting its potential efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Oral flucloxacillin (FLU) is frequently prescribed for infections.
- Limited data exist on oral FLU's efficacy for osteomyelitis (OM) compared to other treatments.
- Expert opinion often favors other oral antibiotics with better bone penetration for OM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing literature on oral FLU for osteomyelitis.
- To compare the efficacy of oral FLU with other oral antibiotics in treating OM.
- To assess oral FLU's effectiveness across different OM types (acute/chronic, pediatric/adult).
Main Methods:
- Literature search for studies on oral FLU in osteomyelitis treatment.
- Stratification of studies by acute vs. chronic and pediatric vs. adult cases.
- Analysis of clinical outcomes and failure rates.
Main Results:
- Oral FLU treatment for OM did not show higher clinical failure rates compared to other oral antibiotics.
- Despite prevailing opinions, available data suggest comparable efficacy.
- Oral FLU is noted for its narrow spectrum, low cost, and infrequent severe adverse effects.
Conclusions:
- Oral flucloxacillin may be a viable treatment option for osteomyelitis.
- Further prospective trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness and advantages.
- Current clinical practice widely uses oral FLU due to its favorable characteristics.
More Related Videos
18:40Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
Published on: October 16, 2014
09:09Treatment with Vancomycin Loaded Calcium Sulphate and Autogenous Bone in an Improved Rabbit Model of Bone Infection
Published on: March 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Tonsillitis II: Management