Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Identifying robust correlates of risk preference: A systematic approach using specification curve analysis.
Renato Frey1, David Richter2, Jürgen Schupp2
1Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Basel.
Risk preference associations depend heavily on measurement methods. While age and sex show consistent links, self-reported measures capture more correlations than behavioral ones, highlighting the importance of operationalization in psychological research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- Risk preferences are crucial for real-life decisions.
- Previous research on risk preference correlates lacks robustness due to varied measurements and analytical limits.
- Identifying reliable correlates of risk preference is essential for psychological theories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate robust correlates of risk preference using diverse operationalizations and advanced analytical techniques.
- To examine the influence of measurement methods (self-report vs. behavioral) on identified correlates.
- To clarify the associations between demographic and cognitive factors and risk preference.
Main Methods:
- Employed specification curve analysis, an exhaustive modeling approach.
- Collected data from a diverse German population sample (N = 916).
- Utilized multiple operationalizations of risk preference and analyzed six candidate correlates: income, sex, age, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and education.
Main Results:
- Sex and age demonstrated robust and consistent associations with risk preference.
- Other correlates, including income, education, and fluid intelligence, showed weaker or domain-specific associations.
- Crystallized intelligence exhibited no robust associations with risk preference.
- Self-reported risk propensity measures revealed more associations with correlates than incentivized behavioral measures.
Conclusions:
- The measurement operationalization of risk preference significantly impacts identified correlates.
- Behavioral measures of risk preference were less associated with demographic and cognitive factors compared to self-report measures.
- Findings underscore the critical role of measurement in understanding risk preference and its correlates, informing theoretical development in personality research.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Statistical Moment Theory
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

