Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.9K
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

643
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
643
Routes of Persuasion02:20

Routes of Persuasion

68.4K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
68.4K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

125
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
125

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gamifying water crisis management: A serious game for drinking water contamination emergency response.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Guiding decisions on the future of dams: A GIS database characterizing ecological and social considerations of Dam decisions.

Journal of environmental management·2023
Same author

Leading the charge: A qualitative case-study of leadership conditions in collaborative environmental governance structures.

Journal of environmental management·2023
Same author

Economic impacts of harmful algal blooms on fishery-dependent communities.

Harmful algae·2022
Same author

Damming news: Geospatial media discourse analysis of dams.

Environmental management·2022
Same author

Localism "Reimagined": Building a Robust Localist Paradigm for Overcoming Emerging Conservation Challenges.

Environmental management·2020
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.5K

Language effects on bargaining.

Michael J Weir1, Catherine M Ashcraft2, Natallia Leuchanka Diessner2

  • 1Dept. of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States of America.

Plos One
|March 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Priming "positions" language in bargaining benefits controllers but not the group. Integrative language did not increase joint outcomes, revealing a bargainer's dilemma between claiming assets and increasing group gains.

More Related Videos

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.4K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

743

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.5K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.4K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

743

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Group coordination relies heavily on language, yet its precise impact on coordination remains unclear.
  • Understanding how different linguistic strategies influence group outcomes is crucial for effective collaboration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of priming distributive and integrative language on group bargaining outcomes.
  • To explore the relationship between communication styles and the distribution of benefits in group negotiations.

Main Methods:

  • A bargaining experiment was conducted using randomized groups.
  • Participants were primed with either "interests" or "positions" language to study communication's effect on outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Priming "positions" language led to agreements where controllers secured a larger share of benefits, without affecting total group benefits.
  • No significant difference was found in increasing joint group outcomes when priming "interests" versus "positions" language.
  • Gain frames and visual aids correlated with larger group gains, while loss frames and pro-self language favored individual gains via side payments.

Conclusions:

  • The study highlights a bargainer's dilemma: choosing between language that maximizes individual claims or language that enhances overall group gains.
  • Linguistic framing significantly impacts benefit distribution and individual versus group outcomes in bargaining scenarios.