Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Andrew M Guess1, Brendan Nyhan2, Jason Reifler3
1Department of Politics and Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Abstract:
Although commentators frequently warn about echo chambers, little is known about the volume or slant of political misinformation that people consume online, the effects of social media and fact checking on exposure, or the effects of political misinformation on behaviour. Here, we evaluate these questions for websites that publish factually dubious content, which is often described as fake news. Survey and web-traffic data from the 2016 US presidential campaign show that supporters of Donald Trump were most likely to visit these websites, which often spread through Facebook. However, these websites made up a small share of people's information diets on average and were largely consumed by a subset of Americans with strong preferences for pro-attitudinal information. These results suggest that the widespread speculation about the prevalence of exposure to untrustworthy websites has been overstated.
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Group Polarization
Understanding Deception
Survey Safety
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
