Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Implementation of a Hyperbolic Vortex Plasma Reactor for the Removal of Micropollutants in Water
Published on: July 25, 2025
Comparison between UVA- and zero-valent iron-activated persulfate processes for degrading propylparaben
Priscila H Palharim1, Cátia A L Graça2, Antonio C S C Teixeira3
1Research Group in Advanced Oxidation Processes (AdOx), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 380, tv 3, São Paulo, 05508-900, Brazil. ppalharim@usp.br.
Advanced oxidation technologies using persulfate effectively degrade propylparaben in water. The zero-valent iron/persulfate process showed superior efficiency and faster degradation rates compared to UVA activation, with reduced toxicity of byproducts.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Water Treatment Technologies
- Advanced Oxidation Processes
Background:
- Conventional wastewater treatments fail to remove parabens, leading to environmental contamination.
- Parabens pose risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health.
- Persulfate (PS)-driven advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs) offer a promising alternative for paraben removal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the degradation of propylparaben (PrP) using UVA- and zero-valent iron (ZVI)-activated persulfate.
- To evaluate the impact of operational parameters like PS concentration, irradiance, and ZVI dosage on PrP removal efficiency.
- To assess the toxicity of PrP degradation products and the influence of water matrix on the AOTs' performance.
Main Methods:
- Doehlert experimental design to optimize PS concentration, irradiance, and ZVI dosage.
- UVA/PS and ZVI/PS advanced oxidation processes for PrP degradation.
- Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for identifying degradation products.
- ECOSAR (Ecological Structure Activity Relationships) modeling for toxicity assessment.
- Evaluation of water matrix effects, including MBR effluent.
Main Results:
- UVA/PS system achieved PrP degradation rates (k) of 0.0053-0.0192 min⁻¹ and 37.9-77.3% removal.
- ZVI/PS process demonstrated significantly faster degradation (0.3304 < k < 0.9212 min⁻¹) with >97.5% removal.
- Optimal ZVI dosage was below 40 mg L⁻¹; higher doses hindered degradation.
- Degradation products were predicted to be less toxic to aquatic organisms (fish, daphnia, algae).
- ZVI/PS process was more affected by MBR effluent matrix but still outperformed UVA/PS (t½: 65.4 min vs. 276.1 min).
Conclusions:
- Both UVA/PS and ZVI/PS are effective AOTs for propylparaben removal.
- ZVI/PS offers a highly efficient and rapid method for paraben degradation.
- The ZVI/PS process shows potential for wastewater treatment, though matrix effects require consideration.
- The generated degradation products exhibit lower ecotoxicity, suggesting a safer environmental outcome.
More Related Videos
09:23Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
Published on: June 21, 2015
05:46Identification of Pharmaceuticals in The Aquatic Environment Using HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS and Elimination of Erythromycin Through Photo-Induced Degradation
Published on: August 1, 2018