Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Natural ventilation performance for airborne diseases management in a deployable treatment facility.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Advancing MSC-EV Therapies: Harnessing Preconditioning and Mito-EVs to Tackle Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium: a systematic review of environmental monitoring methods and analytical advances.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026
Same author

Welding Activities: Is EBC a Reliable Indicator for Assessing Metal Exposure or Early Biological Effects? A Systematic Review.

Journal of breath research·2026
Same author

A survey on occupational medicine residency programs across european countries.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Occupational exposure to total and hexavalent chromium in welders: an integrated environmental and biological monitoring study.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
10:11

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures

Published on: May 7, 2013

16.2K

[Nanoparticle exposure in research laboratories.]

Ivo Iavicoli1, Veruscka Leso1, Luca Fontana2

  • 1Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica - Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli.

Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia
|March 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Assessing occupational exposure to nanomaterials (NM) in research labs is crucial. Current methods face challenges, but qualitative data aids risk management for worker safety.

Keywords:
exposure assessmentnanomaterialsresearch laboratoriesrisk assessmentrisk management

More Related Videos

A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling
07:01

A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling

Published on: February 22, 2019

7.5K
Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles
05:07

Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
10:11

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures

Published on: May 7, 2013

16.2K
A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling
07:01

A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling

Published on: February 22, 2019

7.5K
Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles
05:07

Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health and safety
  • Materials science
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Research laboratories increasingly employ workers handling diverse nanomaterials (NM).
  • Evaluating occupational risks necessitates robust exposure assessment strategies.
  • Understanding NM physico-chemical and toxicological properties is key to risk evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review existing literature on NM exposure in laboratory settings.
  • To identify challenges and propose solutions for effective exposure assessment.
  • To inform risk management strategies for protecting laboratory workers.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive critical review of scientific and grey literature.
  • Analysis of working processes and NM characteristics relevant to exposure.
  • Evaluation of environmental and personal monitoring techniques.

Main Results:

  • Exposure assessment involves analyzing work processes and NM properties.
  • Quantitative assessment via monitoring is challenging due to metrological uncertainties and lack of defined occupational exposure limits.
  • Qualitative data can be utilized in control banding tools for precautionary risk management.

Conclusions:

  • Control banding offers a practical approach for preliminary risk assessment and management of NM exposure in research labs.
  • Further research into NM environmental and personal exposure is essential.
  • Developing standardized monitoring strategies and preventive measures is critical for worker health protection.