Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

483
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
483
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

389
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
389
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

815
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
815
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

36.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.7K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

925
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
925
Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.2K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term action-effect bindings encode perceptual transitions rather than perceptual end-states.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Binding continuous response features of extended movements: Integration with discrete response but not stimulus features.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Playing With Matches: Preparatory Cognitive Processing Shapes Affective Evaluation.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Action Selection by Temporally Close Transitions? Subtle Evidence from the Removal of Tactile Stimulation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K

Situation selection and cognitive conflict: explicit knowledge is necessary for conflict avoidance.

Constantin Schmidts1, Anna Foerster1, Wilfried Kunde1

  • 1Department of Psychology III, University of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany.

Cognition & Emotion
|March 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary

People do not automatically avoid cognitive conflict to regulate their emotions. Avoiding conflict-free situations requires explicit awareness of the link between actions and upcoming conflict levels.

Keywords:
Cognitive controlaffect regulationdemand avoidance

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

355
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

355
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Affective Science
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Humans modify their environment to manage emotional states, often by avoiding negative affect.
  • Anticipating the discomfort of cognitive conflict, where situations prompt competing actions, may also drive avoidance.
  • If cognitive conflict is aversive, it could initiate affect regulation, influencing situation choices based on conflict magnitude.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals automatically prefer conflict-free situations over conflict-inducing ones for affect regulation.
  • To determine if explicit knowledge of action-congruency contingencies is necessary to avoid cognitive conflict.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using a Stroop task.
  • Participants freely chose between response keys linked to low-conflict or high-conflict trials.
  • The study examined choices in relation to explicit information about action-congruency contingencies.

Main Results:

  • Participants did not spontaneously choose actions leading to conflict-free situations.
  • Preference for conflict-free situations emerged only when participants were explicitly informed about the contingency between their actions and the upcoming trial's congruency.
  • Standard conflict tasks alone were insufficient to trigger affect regulation processes.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive conflict, at the level tested, does not automatically elicit affect regulation strategies.
  • Explicit awareness of the relationship between choices and subsequent conflict is crucial for individuals to actively avoid cognitive conflict.
  • Affect regulation may depend on conscious appraisal of conflict-related consequences rather than automatic aversion.