Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

801
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
801
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

161
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
161
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

12.2K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.2K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

119
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
119
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.8K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rural Diets Under Pressure: Food Environments and their Influence on Diets in South Asia.

The British journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Time to stop focusing on catch-up growth.

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Food on the go: How engagement with the food environment affects adolescent diets in Northern Vietnam.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Perceived Challenges and Solutions to Adopting Healthy Diets Among Women and Children: A Photovoice Study in Urban Ethiopia.

Maternal & child nutrition·2026
Same author

Black soldier fly larvae and cricket fortified crackers are a safe, nutritious, and acceptable snack for school children in Madagascar.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Women's experiences of the food environment and their association with fruit and vegetable intake: Insights from northern Tanzania.

Health & place·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.4K

Randomized controlled trials of multi-sectoral programs: Lessons from development research.

Agnes R Quisumbing1, Akhter Ahmed1, Daniel O Gilligan1

  • 1International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC, United States.

World Development
|March 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multisectoral development programs improve nutrition and food security. This research uses randomized trials and mixed methods to ensure programs are effective, valid, and scalable for real-world impact.

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.1K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.4K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.1K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Development Economics
  • Public Health Nutrition
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Achieving development goals necessitates a multi-sectoral approach.
  • Multisectoral programs are crucial for improving nutrition and food security in developing nations.
  • Research groups have focused on evaluating these programs for over two decades.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the effectiveness of multisectoral programs in enhancing nutrition, food security, and overall well-being.
  • To address limitations of traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including their "black box" nature, limited external validity, and challenges in scaling up results.
  • To identify and evaluate programmatic pathways to impact using mixed methods.

Main Methods:

  • Design and implementation of randomized trials to evaluate multisectoral interventions.
  • Utilizing quantitative and qualitative methods to identify and assess pathways to impact.
  • Conducting comparative studies of similar programs across diverse settings and organizations.
  • Collaborating closely with implementing partners throughout the research process.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated effectiveness of multisectoral programs in improving key development indicators.
  • Identified specific programmatic elements and pathways that contribute to successful outcomes.
  • Provided evidence on the external validity and scalability of interventions.
  • Facilitated the translation of research findings into actionable policy and program adaptations.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-sectoral approach is essential for effective development and achieving significant improvements in nutrition and food security.
  • The research methodology addresses critical limitations of standard RCTs, enhancing the relevance and applicability of findings.
  • Close collaboration with implementing partners is key to successful program adaptation and scale-up for sustained impact.