Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

913
The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of...
913
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

600
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
600
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population01:14

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

395
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
395
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

404
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
404
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

439
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
439
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

351
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
351

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuropsychological late effects in young children with medulloblastoma: A longitudinal analysis after 5 and 15 years from the HIT-SKK-'87/'92 studies.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

Geriatric-Typical Characteristic Complexes Predict Short-Term Outcome of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Geriatric Patients.

Clinical interventions in aging·2026
Same author

Diameter of the fetal pancreas and abdomen-to-pancreas-ratio: novel ultrasound parameters in fetal growth restriction.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2026
Same author

Characterizing Overall Survival of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Competing Risk Analysis of SEER Data Covering 46 Years.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Risk profiles of common brachial plexus block sites: results from the net-ra registry.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2024
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

An improved one-sample log-rank test.

Laura Kerschke1, Andreas Faldum1, Rene Schmidt1

  • 1Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|March 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an improved one-sample log-rank test for clinical trials. The new method offers accurate survival analysis with smaller sample sizes, enhancing study efficiency.

Keywords:
One-sample log-rank testphase IIa trialreference populationsample size calculationtime-to-event

More Related Videos

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

15.2K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

436

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

15.2K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

436

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • The one-sample log-rank test is used in single-arm trials to compare sample survival against a reference curve.
  • The original test is known to be conservative with small sample sizes, necessitating corrections.
  • Existing methods aim to address conservativeness but may not be optimal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an improved one-sample log-rank test statistic.
  • To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of survival analysis in small sample settings.
  • To reduce the sample size required for achieving desired statistical power.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel one-sample log-rank statistic using a unique transformation of the counting process martingale.
  • Ensured the limiting normal distribution's moments are parameter-free.
  • Evaluated the new statistic through simulations.

Main Results:

  • The new one-sample log-rank test maintains type I error rates and power close to nominal levels, even with small sample sizes.
  • Demonstrated a significant reduction in the required sample size compared to existing approaches.
  • The method shows improved performance in designing studies for survival outcome comparison.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed one-sample log-rank test offers a more accurate and efficient alternative for survival analysis in single-arm trials.
  • This advancement is particularly beneficial for studies with small sample sizes and time-to-event endpoints.
  • The improved test facilitates more effective study designs by reducing sample size requirements.