Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

05:31
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
Published on: February 26, 2020
15.4K
The Case for Measuring and Reporting Bilingualism in Developmental Research.
Krista Byers-Heinlein1, Alena G Esposito2, Adam Winsler3
1Department of Psychology, Concordia University, CA.
Collabra. Psychology
|March 6, 2020
Summary
Bilingual children
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Linguistics
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Bilingualism is common globally, yet children's language backgrounds are often unreported in developmental studies.
- Bilingualism influences language, cognitive, perceptual, brain, and social development, impacting educational outcomes.
- Unreported bilingualism can obscure developmental patterns and limit research replicability and intervention efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- Advocate for routine documentation of bilingualism in child development research.
- Highlight the role of bilingualism as a potential hidden moderator in developmental studies.
- Provide guidance on measuring and reporting children's language exposure, proficiency, and use.
Main Methods:
- This study is a review and argument, synthesizing existing evidence on bilingualism's impact.
- It proposes a framework for systematically collecting data on children's language experiences.
- The approach emphasizes the importance of detailed language background information.
Main Results:
- Bilingualism significantly interacts with multiple developmental domains.
- Failure to document language background can lead to inaccurate conclusions and irreproducible findings.
- Standardized reporting of language experience is crucial for robust developmental research.
Conclusions:
- Routine documentation of bilingualism is essential for accurate and replicable child development research.
- Understanding children's language backgrounds enhances the validity of psychological and educational interventions.
- Standardized reporting practices will advance the field of developmental science.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
642
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
642
Language Development
741
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
741
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
1.6K
Alfred Binet, along with his student Théophile Simon, was tasked by the French Ministry of Education in 1904 to create a method for identifying students who struggled to learn through conventional classroom instruction. This initiative aimed to address overcrowding by placing such students in specialized schools. Binet and Simon developed an intelligence test comprising 30 tasks, ranging from simple commands, like touching one's nose or ear, to more complex tasks, such as drawing...
1.6K
Group Design
10.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.0K

