Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
Published on: December 28, 2017
Setup error with and without image guidance using two canine intracranial positioning systems for radiation therapy
Celina Y Morimoto1, Monique N Mayer1, Narinder Sidhu2
1Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
A new head positioning system (HPS) improved setup accuracy in intracranial radiation therapy compared to the standard system (SPS) before and after megavoltage (MV) guidance. Initial accuracy impacts residual setup error after image guidance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Technology
Background:
- Daily image guidance is crucial for reducing patient positioning errors in intracranial radiation therapy.
- However, residual setup errors can persist due to limitations in detecting and correcting small positioning inaccuracies.
- The pre-image guidance accuracy of positioning systems may influence the final residual setup error.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the setup accuracy of a novel head positioning system (HPS) against a standard positioning system (SPS) before and after image guidance (megavoltage and cone-beam CT).
- To evaluate the impact of initial positioning accuracy on residual setup errors after image guidance in intracranial radiation therapy.
Main Methods:
- Six dog cadavers were positioned 24 times using the HPS in a head repositioner.
- Fiducial marker coordinates were measured before and after image-guided correction (MV and CBCT).
- Setup accuracy, quantified by the mean three-dimensional distance vector (3DDV), was compared between HPS and SPS.
Main Results:
- The HPS demonstrated significantly lower mean 3DDV than the SPS before image guidance (P = .019).
- After MV guidance, the HPS also showed a significantly lower mean 3DDV than the SPS (P = .027).
- No significant difference in mean 3DDV was observed between HPS and SPS after CBCT guidance (P = .231).
- The 95th percentile setup errors were lower for HPS (2.1 mm MV, 2.9 mm CBCT) than SPS (2.8 mm MV, 3.6 mm CBCT).
- A more accurate pre-image guidance position correlated with lower residual setup error after MV guidance.
Conclusions:
- The head positioning system (HPS) offers improved setup accuracy over the standard positioning system (SPS) for intracranial radiation therapy, particularly before and after MV image guidance.
- Initial positioning accuracy is a critical factor influencing residual setup errors, highlighting the importance of precise patient setup prior to image guidance.
- The findings suggest that optimizing the positioning system can enhance the overall accuracy and effectiveness of image-guided radiation therapy for intracranial treatments.
More Related Videos
12:09A Novel High-resolution In vivo Imaging Technique to Study the Dynamic Response of Intracranial Structures to Tumor Growth and Therapeutics
Published on: June 16, 2013
08:02A High-Throughput Image-Guided Stereotactic Neuronavigation and Focused Ultrasound System for Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Rodents
Published on: July 16, 2020