Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014
Comparative Analysis of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Subcellular Proteomics
Abla Tannous1, Marielle Boonen2, Haiyan Zheng1
1Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.
Quantitative mass spectrometry combined with subcellular fractionation effectively maps cellular proteomes. Tandem mass tag (TMT)-MS2 offers the highest proteome coverage and lowest missing data for protein localization studies.
Area of Science:
- Proteomics
- Cell Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Understanding protein intracellular location is crucial for elucidating protein function and organelle roles.
- Global cellular mapping integrates subcellular fractionation with quantitative mass spectrometry.
- Evaluating mass spectrometry techniques is essential for accurate proteome analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess various mass spectrometry approaches for quantitative proteomic analysis of subcellular fractions.
- To compare the performance of tandem mass tag (TMT) isobaric labeling (MS2 and MS3) and label-free methods (MS1 and data-independent acquisition - DIA).
- To determine the optimal method for high-coverage, accurate protein localization in cellular maps.
Main Methods:
- Rat liver subcellular fractions were generated using differential centrifugation and Nycodenz density gradients.
- Proteomic analysis employed TMT isobaric labeling with MS2 and MS3 reporter ion quantification.
- Label-free quantification utilized MS1 intensity-based and data-independent acquisition (DIA) approaches.
- Protein localization accuracy was assessed using a protein clustering approach with reference proteins.
Main Results:
- TMT-MS2 achieved the highest proteome coverage and lowest percentage of missing quantifiable data.
- Ratio compression in TMT-MS2 narrowed the accurate dynamic range compared to TMT-MS3, MS1, and DIA.
- All evaluated methods demonstrated good data quality for protein localization, with isobaric labeling yielding superior results.
- TMT-MS2 provided comparable protein localization accuracy to other methods despite dynamic range limitations.
Conclusions:
- TMT-MS2 is a valuable method for subcellular proteome mapping, offering extensive coverage and minimal missing values.
- While TMT-MS2 exhibits ratio compression, its performance in protein localization and data completeness is highly competitive.
- The study validates mass spectrometry-based approaches for generating comprehensive cellular maps through subcellular fractionation.
More Related Videos
14:51Comprehensive Workflow of Mass Spectrometry-based Shotgun Proteomics of Tissue Samples
Published on: November 13, 2021
10:37Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Subcellular Fractionation
Differential Centrifugation
Differential centrifugation is...
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...