Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
6.2K
Effective forewarning requires central route processing: Theoretical improvements on the counterargumentation
Yasuhiro Daiku1,2, Naoki Kugihara3, Tsukasa Teraguchi1
1Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Plos One
|March 6, 2020
Summary
Forewarning against financial scams is ineffective if people process information emotionally. Remembering scam warnings is crucial for developing counterarguments and preventing victimization.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Cybersecurity
Background:
- Financial scams cause significant global damage.
- Current scam prevention methods in Japan, like warnings and awareness campaigns, are insufficient.
- Scammers exploit emotional appeals, leading to peripheral processing that hinders recall of warnings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if forewarning effectiveness against scams depends on information processing routes.
- To investigate the role of forewarning recollection in enabling counterarguments.
Main Methods:
- 162 participants were experimentally exposed to forewarnings and deceptive advertisements.
- Participants' processing routes (central vs. peripheral) and recall of warnings were assessed.
- The rating of advertisers' manipulative intent was measured.
Main Results:
- Forewarning only enhanced detection of manipulative intent when participants used central processing.
- Peripheral processing of advertisements negated the effect of forewarning.
- Forewarning recollection mediated the influence of processing route on manipulative intent ratings.
Conclusions:
- Effective scam prevention requires active, central information processing, not just passive awareness.
- Recalling forewarnings is essential for individuals to generate counterarguments against scam tactics.
- Findings offer insights into scam susceptibility and inform improved prevention strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Routes of Persuasion
68.4K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
68.4K
Counterfactual Thinking
168
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
168
Understanding Deception
122
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
122
Persuasion Strategies
42.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.9K
Framing Effects
7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Cause and Effect
11.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.9K

