Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
First-line targ veted therapies of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network analysis of randomized
Wei Ding1,2, Yulin Tan1,2, Yan Qian3
1Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China.
Purpose:
A variety of targeted drug were developed and proved effective and safe in clinical trials. Our study aims to compare the efficacies and safety of different targeted drugs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for first-line treatment using a Bayesian network meta-analysis approach.
Methods:
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced HCC patients that treated with different targeted drugs. Time to progress (TTP), overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) were calculated as hazard ratios (HRs). Objective response rate (ORR) and the proportion of Grade 3-5 adverse events (G3-5AE) were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). We pooled study-specific HRs and ORs using Bayesian network meta-analyses, and ranked first-line drugs by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
Results:
A total of 22 RCTs with 9288 patients were enrolled. Brivanib, linifanib, lenvatinib and sorafenib showed a significant improvement on TTP compared to placebo (HR range, 0.45-0.72). Sunitinib (HR = 1.99) and nintedanib (HR = 2.17) showed a significant decline on TTP compared to lenvatinib. Vandetanib (HR = 0.44) and sorafenib (HR = 0.73) showed a significant improvement on OS compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in PFS, ORR and G3-5AE across different drugs. According to cluster rank analysis, vandetanib was the drug with both more effective (OS) and more secure (G3-5AE) compared to Sor followed by nintedanib.
Conclusions:
This network meta-analysis shows that vandetanib, linifanib, lenvatinib and nintedanib potentially may be the best substitution of sorafenib against advanced HCC as first-line targeted drugs. Vandetanib seems to be the best choise with low quality of evidence. For better survival, novel targeted treatment options for HCC are sorely needed.
Insights
This study compared targeted drugs for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Vandetanib showed promise for improved overall survival (OS) and safety, but evidence quality is low, highlighting the need for new treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Targeted therapies have emerged as effective treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
- Evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of these drugs is crucial for optimizing first-line treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of various targeted drugs for first-line treatment in advanced HCC.
- To identify the most effective and safest targeted drug options based on available clinical trial data.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Hazard ratios (HRs) for time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated.
- Odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) and Grade 3-5 adverse events (G3-5AE) were determined.
- Bayesian network meta-analyses were employed to pool data, and drug rankings were generated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
Main Results:
- Twenty-two RCTs involving 9288 patients were analyzed.
- Brivanib, linifanib, lenvatinib, and sorafenib demonstrated significant improvements in TTP compared to placebo.
- Vandetanib and sorafenib showed significant improvements in OS compared to placebo.
- No significant differences were observed in PFS, ORR, or G3-5AE across the evaluated drugs.
- Vandetanib was identified as potentially the most effective (OS) and safest (G3-5AE) option, followed by nintedanib, though with low quality of evidence.
Conclusions:
- Vandetanib, linifanib, lenvatinib, and nintedanib may serve as viable alternatives to sorafenib for first-line treatment in advanced HCC.
- Vandetanib appears to be a promising option, but further research is needed due to low evidence quality.
- The development of novel targeted therapies is essential to improve survival outcomes for HCC patients.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers