Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

09:45
Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
Published on: February 17, 2017
12.0K
Comparative study of whole exome sequencing-based copy number variation detection tools
Lanling Zhao1, Han Liu1, Xiguo Yuan2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
BMC Bioinformatics
|March 7, 2020
Summary
This study evaluates four whole exome sequencing (WES) copy number variation (CNV) detection tools, providing a guideline for selecting the best tool based on specific project needs like CNV size and computational cost.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Whole exome sequencing (WES) enables copy number variation (CNV) detection.
- Clinical application of WES-based CNV tools is hindered by a lack of usage guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of four WES-based CNV detection tools.
- To establish a guideline for selecting appropriate CNV detection tools for clinical settings.
Main Methods:
- Selected four WES-based CNV detection tools: CoNIFER, cn.MOPS, CNVkit, and exomeCopy.
- Evaluated tools based on sensitivity, specificity, overlapping consistency, and computational costs.
Main Results:
- Sensitivity increases with coverage/CNV size, while specificity decreases.
- CoNIFER excels at detecting insertions; others favor deletions.
- CoNIFER, cn.MOPS, and CNVkit show reliable overlapping consistency.
- CoNIFER offers best space complexity; cn.MOPS offers best time complexity.
Conclusions:
- No single tool is optimal for all scenarios; tool performance varies.
- A guideline is provided to aid tool selection based on CNV size, type, and computational resources.
- This resource assists users, even those with limited computational expertise, in choosing the right CNV detection tool.
Keywords:
Computational costsCopy number variantsGuidelineNext generation sequencingOverlapping consistencyRecommendationSensitivitySpecificityWhole exome sequencingMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
18.5K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.5K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
6.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.8K
Genome Copying Errors
4.9K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.9K

