Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
A comparative study on the validations of three cognitive screening tests in identifying subtle cognitive decline
Feng-Feng Pan1, Lin Huang1, Ke-Liang Chen2
1Department of Gerontology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, P. R. China.
The Memory and Executive Screening (MES) test is more effective than MMSE and MoCA-CV in identifying subtle cognitive decline (SCD) in individuals. Early detection of SCD is crucial for dementia prevention and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Gerontology
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Subtle cognitive decline (SCD) represents an early stage of cognitive impairment preceding mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
- Early detection of SCD is critical for dementia prevention and therapeutic interventions.
- This study evaluates the efficacy of three cognitive screening tests in identifying SCD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the validation of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Chinese Version (MoCA-CV), and Memory and Executive Screening (MES) in detecting subtle cognitive decline.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of these screening tests in differentiating individuals with SCD from cognitively normal controls and those with MCI.
Main Methods:
- Recruited 407 participants: 147 cognitively normal (NC), 102 with SCD, and 158 with MCI.
- Administered comprehensive neuropsychological tests and the three screening tests (MMSE, MoCA-CV, MES).
- Utilized Chi-square analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves to compare cognitive performance and evaluate test discrimination.
Main Results:
- SCD individuals showed memory decline (AVLT, CFT, PrM), while MCI individuals exhibited decline across all cognitive domains.
- MMSE, MoCA-CV, and MES scores showed a significant progressive decline from NC to SCD to MCI groups.
- MES demonstrated superior performance in discriminating SCD from NC, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.738, compared to MMSE (AUC=0.643) and MoCA-CV (AUC=0.644).
Conclusions:
- The Memory and Executive Screening (MES) test is a more efficacious screening tool for identifying subtle cognitive decline compared to MMSE and MoCA-CV.
- MES offers better sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing individuals with early-stage cognitive decline from those who are cognitively normal.
- These findings support the use of MES for early detection of cognitive impairment, facilitating timely intervention for dementia prevention.
More Related Videos
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
06:23The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016