Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Disability Severity, Leader-Member Exchange, and Attitudinal Outcomes: Considering the Employee and Supervisor
Zhanna Lyubykh1, Mahfooz A Ansari2, Kelly Williams-Whitt2
1Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. zhanna.lyubykh1@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract:
Purpose Although the effects of disability on employee work outcomes are well-documented, the mechanism that explain these relationship remains unclear. We propose that the quality of relationships employees with disabilities develop with their supervisors explains the link between disability severity and employee work outcomes. More specifically, we examine the mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) in the relationship between employee disability severity and presenteeism, job accommodation, supervisor-rated performance, job satisfaction, and resilience. We test this proposition from two perspectives: employees with disabilities and supervisors who had supervised employees with disabilities. Method We collected data from employees with musculoskeletal disabilities (Sample 1, N = 264) and supervisors who had supervised employees with musculoskeletal disabilities in the past two years (Sample 2, N = 224). Results From the perspective of employees with disabilities (Sample 1), disability severity was negatively related to LMX quality (R2 = .28). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between supervisor perceptions of employee disability severity and LMX in Sample 2 (R2 = .27). After adjusting for disability severity, LMX quality was related to improved outcomes in both samples: higher employee job satisfaction (Sample 1: R2 = .36), provision of job accommodations (Sample 1: R2 = .16; Sample 2: R2= .15), resilience (Sample 1: R2 = .18), lower levels of presenteeism (Sample 1: R2 = .20), and higher performance evaluations for employees with disabilities (Sample 2: R2 = .49). Conclusion By collecting two separate samples, we revealed similarities and differences in employee and supervisor perspectives. Our findings demonstrated the need for including both perspectives when considering implications of employee disability severity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Halo Effect
Actor-Observer Effect
Relationship Formation
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Obedience
Impact of Individuals on Individuals

