Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Use of Ultra-high Field MRI in Small Rodent Models of Polycystic Kidney Disease for In Vivo Phenotyping and Drug Monitoring
Published on: June 23, 2015
Approaches for the identification of chronic kidney disease in CPRD-HES-linked studies
Sreeram Ramagopalan1, Thomas P Leahy2, Elaine Stamp2
1Centre for Observational Research & Data Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.
Insights
Identifying chronic kidney disease (CKD) in CPRD-HES data requires combining test results and diagnostic codes. Relying solely on codes underestimates CKD prevalence, affecting patient care.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Epidemiology
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) identification in large healthcare datasets like CPRD-HES is crucial for patient management.
- Existing methods for CKD detection in CPRD-HES may have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare different methods for identifying CKD stages in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation within the CPRD-HES database.
- To determine the most accurate approach for CKD prevalence estimation in this population.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data.
- Classified nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients based on CKD categories using various identification methods.
- Compared CKD prevalence estimates derived from glomerular filtration rate (GFR)/estimated GFR (eGFR) tests, diagnostic codes, and a combination of both.
Main Results:
- GFR/eGFR tests alone identified low percentages of CKD stages (e.g., 3.5% stage 2, 2.7% stage 3).
- Diagnostic codes alone resulted in lower prevalence estimates (e.g., 1.4% stage 3, 0.4% stage 4).
- Combining test records and diagnostic codes yielded higher prevalence rates (e.g., 3.5% stage 2, 4.0% stage 3, 0.6% stage 4, 0.4% stage 5).
Conclusions:
- A combined approach using both test records and diagnostic codes is recommended for accurate CKD identification in CPRD-HES.
- Diagnostic codes alone significantly underestimate the prevalence of CKD.
- Accurate CKD identification is vital for appropriate clinical management and research.
Abstract:
Aim: There are different methods to identify chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)-Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). Methods: Using CPRD-HES, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients were classified according to CKD category. Results: Using glomerular filtration rate/estimated glomerular filtration rate tests only to identify patients with CKD resulted in 3.5% stage 2, 2.7% stage 3, 0.3% stage 4 and 0.03% stage 5. Using data from diagnostic codes to identify patients with CKD resulted in 1.4% stage 3, 0.4% stage 4 and 0.3% stage 5. Using test records and codes resulted in 3.5% stage 2, 4.0% stage 3, 0.6% stage 4 and 0.4% stage 5. Conclusion: To identify CKD status in CPRD-HES, a combination of test records and codes should be used. Using diagnostic codes only significantly underestimates CKD prevalence.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management

