Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in "Real-World" Community Cardiology Practice
Ethan J Rowin1, Martin S Maron1, Viraj Bhatt2
1Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Institute, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Chanin T. Mast Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey.
Insights
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) patients in community cardiology practice show similar disease presentation and outcomes to those in referral centers. However, timely intervention for outflow obstruction and accurate sudden death risk assessment require attention in community settings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) management and outcomes can vary between community cardiology practices and specialized referral centers.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing patient care and ensuring consistent treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical presentation, natural history, and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) patients in a community cardiology setting versus a referral center cohort.
- To identify potential disparities in disease expression, symptom progression, and treatment approaches.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional analysis of 253 consecutive HC patients managed in a "real-world" clinical cardiology practice.
- Comparison of patient characteristics, left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, outflow obstruction, symptoms, atrial fibrillation, sudden death (SD) events, and interventions with a highly selected referral center cohort.
Main Results:
- HC patients in community practice demonstrated similar disease expression and natural history to referral patients, with stable and largely benign clinical courses.
- Progressive heart failure symptoms were more common in the referral cohort (36% vs. 26%).
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) were used for SD prevention in community practice, though risk was overestimated in some cases. Delays in recommending surgical myectomy or septal ablation for drug-refractory outflow obstruction were noted.
Conclusions:
- Clinical characteristics and the course of HC patients in community practice generally mirror those in HC referral centers.
- Community cardiologists largely adhere to guideline-based strategies, but opportunities exist to improve SD risk assessment and the timely management of outflow obstruction.
- Optimizing intervention strategies for severe symptoms and outflow obstruction is essential for improving outcomes in community-based HC management.
Abstract:
Differences in presentation and natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) between community cardiology practice and referral centers has been a source of considerable uncertainty. We report here a cross-sectional analysis of 253 consecutive HC patients from a "real-world" clinical cardiology setting. When compared with a highly selected referral center cohort, patients in clinical practice proved to be similar with regard to disease expression such as left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, outflow obstruction, and natural history, including stable and largely benign clinical course with no or mild symptoms (61% in community practice vs. 55% in referred patients, p = 0.23), occurrence of atrial fibrillation (22% vs. 24%, p = 0.75) and nonfatal sudden death (SD) events (3% vs. 4%, p = 0.8). In contrast, progressive heart failure symptoms were most common in the referral cohort (36% vs. 26%, p = 0.04). In clinical practice, SD was prevented by prophylactic implatable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in 5 of 44 patients (11%), although risk was overestimated in 6 patients who were implanted with ICDs in the absence of risk markers (14%). In 16 of 61 (26%) severely symptomatic drug-refractory patients with LV outflow obstruction, recommendation for surgical myectomy (or alcohol septal ablation) was delayed. In conclusion, clinical characteristics and course of HC patients in community practice were generally similar to those in HC referral centers. Community cardiologists managed HC patients predominantly in concert with guideline-based strategies, although risk for SD could be overestimated, and the significance of outflow obstruction with timely reversal of refractory heart failure by intervention was underappreciated.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

